User talk:RyGuy
From Wikireligion
Welcome to wikireligion RyGuy! I think you will find it much more calm than wikikidsen here. I am wondering if you can make some templates to use on articles. Also will you do me another favor and make me some portals? Like saints, and one for each major religion? If/when you do tell me where to find them. Thanks. Happy editing. --Sir James Paul 10:27, 3 February 2007 (EST)
- Sure thing! RyGuy 06:02, 5 February 2007 (EST)
- Please take your age off your user page.--Sir James Paul 08:40, 5 February 2007 (EST)
- Okay, done. (I think I know why you asked) RyGuy 08:42, 5 February 2007 (EST)
- Sorry for taking a while but I was not online. You have to do what is said in the policy. --Sir James Paul 13:32, 5 February 2007 (EST)
- Okay, but then why was Arjun auto-sysopped? RyGuy 14:12, 5 February 2007 (EST)
Contents |
Sir James Paul RFA
Is currently only for his adminship powers. If you wish to bring up bureacratship change it to Oppose, Sysop + Bureaucrat or something like that. Same with me (ForestH2). ForestH2 19:29, 8 February 2007 (EST)
Supposedly....
Nothing, I believe. It might also revert vandalism. I've long since stopped using it. Um, by the way I still have checkuser powers and I have checkusered AntiChrist, ILoveReligion etc. They are all sockpuppets. All I need to do is block them. I've contacted Sir James Paul everyway I could at this point. ForestH2 10:05, 24 February 2007 (EST)
- As AntiChrist told you, they're probably using Tor or something (like I am) to cloak one's actual IP for privacy reasons. You can't accuse of sockpuppettry only based on having IPs in common some of the times. (one figures you know all about sockpuppetry, since you have been banned from various Wikis because of you being one) Qwerty 13:22, 28 February 2007 (EST)
- Ok, *sighs* maybe we should make a new wiki, copy this wiki, then continue from there. -- RyGuy (talk • contribs) 09:06, 28 February 2007 (EST)
- Yeah, good luck with that. heh. Qwerty 13:22, 28 February 2007 (EST)
Tip
Don't remove my own messages from my own talk page. AntiChrist 17:26, 6 March 2007 (EST)
- Hey. I made you a sysop. Peace :) --Sir James Paul 23:24, 7 March 2007 (EST)
A 3 month block of AntiChrist is still against policy. Should be 24 hours, after a warning. JesusFreak 11:42, 8 March 2007 (EST)
Relax, no one is arguing. I'm just pointing out a (continued) policy violation here. JesusFreak 13:30, 8 March 2007 (EST)
Sysop powers
I need to get my sysop powers back if you want me to continue on this wiki. Otherwise, I will leave. ForestH2 10:55, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- I have made you a bureaucrat. I will pretty much leave you alone and let you do what you want within reason. --Sir James Paul 16:35, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- Can you make me a sysop? If you do, I'll remain running in an RFA to maintain status. I also need bureaucrat powers. Thx. ForestH2 18:12, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- Since you're giving it out like crack, why not make everyone a sysop?
- You must run in an RFA to maintain status to do this. ForestH2 11:01, 10 March 2007 (EST)
- Thank you for sysop powers. I feel that I'll run in an RFA for bureaucrat tools because it's unfair I get both tools at the same time. After some time, if I get enough supports in an RFA I can become a bureaucrat. The only reason I would be auto-bureaucrated is if you aren't active an the Request for adminship page is clogged up with needs for other users for adminship. ForestH2 09:45, 12 March 2007 (EST)
- You must run in an RFA to maintain status to do this. ForestH2 11:01, 10 March 2007 (EST)
- Since you're giving it out like crack, why not make everyone a sysop?
- Can you make me a sysop? If you do, I'll remain running in an RFA to maintain status. I also need bureaucrat powers. Thx. ForestH2 18:12, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- I have made you a bureaucrat. I will pretty much leave you alone and let you do what you want within reason. --Sir James Paul 16:35, 9 March 2007 (EST)
Ah, I should probably have just ignored him but...
He was angering me to much that I just decided to respond to his questions at whatever. It was also a part of my plan on which to start by answering whatever and then switch to just plainly ignoring it. I should probably have been a bit nicer though. Oh by the way, as I said on the talk page if you find any bugs or any software updates you need to be added let me know right away. ForestH2 17:20, 12 March 2007 (EST)
- From now on we will block whoever is making a dispute with someone with no warning as long as we want. --Sir James Paul 22:09, 13 March 2007 (EST)
- And I presume the same policy applies to you, and Forest, too, right? Seven of nine 22:29, 13 March 2007 (EST)
- Yes, because it is annoying just to give warnings for people so out of control. ForestH2 22:43, 13 March 2007 (EST)
- And I presume the same policy applies to you, and Forest, too, right? Seven of nine 22:29, 13 March 2007 (EST)
- From now on we will block whoever is making a dispute with someone with no warning as long as we want. --Sir James Paul 22:09, 13 March 2007 (EST)
Thanks...
...for the welcome, RyGuy! I still may have questions here and there, since I'm new. But at least I know now where to ask them :-) P.B. Pilhet 17:14, 16 March 2007 (EST)
Thanks a lot!
Thanks for helping me with setting this place up. I do not have the time now. Peace:) --Sir James Paul 17:36, 17 March 2007 (EST)
Talk:Main Page#voting
Um, when do these come into effect? ForestH2 09:49, 19 March 2007 (EST)
Email address
I've changed the format of your email address to try and protect against spambots. If you don't know, spammers run programs to search through websites to pick up email links and text that seems like a valid email format. It's then added to a database and you'll never see the end of the spam. I've changed it into a format that's understandable to any human, yet won't be picked up by spambots. Revert it if you like, it was just a thought. Archer7 16:36, 27 March 2007 (EST)
- FWIW, I think most spam bots have decoded the "AT" and "DOT" attempts at obfuscation. --Qwerty 17:05, 27 March 2007 (EST)
