User:Qwerty
From Wikireligion
(Difference between revisions)
(→Yes, but......: if GDFL, then copying from en.wiki is ok) |
(→Yes, but...... - respond) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*It is a copyvio issue to take content from wikipedia and bring it here. I did not know it is at first but know I do. It is not my policy, it is the law. All stuff here will be released under GDFL. Have a nice week. [[User:Sir James Paul|Sir James Paul]] 16:36, 13 January 2007 (EST) | *It is a copyvio issue to take content from wikipedia and bring it here. I did not know it is at first but know I do. It is not my policy, it is the law. All stuff here will be released under GDFL. Have a nice week. [[User:Sir James Paul|Sir James Paul]] 16:36, 13 January 2007 (EST) | ||
:I don't think you understand copyrights or the GDFL. First, if this site's content is released under GDFL, then you should state that somewhere. Second, if this site's content is released under GDFL, then we ''can'' take content straight from en.wikipedia, since their content is also under GDFL. You should research that at wikipedia's related pages (I can't seem to paste links here). --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 16:47, 13 January 2007 (EST) | :I don't think you understand copyrights or the GDFL. First, if this site's content is released under GDFL, then you should state that somewhere. Second, if this site's content is released under GDFL, then we ''can'' take content straight from en.wikipedia, since their content is also under GDFL. You should research that at wikipedia's related pages (I can't seem to paste links here). --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 16:47, 13 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Which means it shows Wikireligion is clueless if we can copy info from Wikipedia. [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 10:43, 14 January 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:43, 14 January 2007
Qwerty, welcome to wikireligion. I hope that you enjoy it here. --Sir James Paul 08:17, 3 January 2007 (EST)
- Its nice to see you editing here. --Sir James Paul 20:47, 7 January 2007 (EST)
Yes, but......
Yes, I know. However, Sir James Paul and me, both think we should do our articles in our own words, not in anyone elses words. If you want to know copy a sentence, go ahead. If you want to copy a pargraph, don't do it. We should write in our own words, the way we like it. ForestH2 18:42, 9 January 2007 (EST)
- Ok, then you better delete the Matt Slick article, becuase Sir James copied that straight from Wikipedia. Qwerty 18:47, 9 January 2007 (EST)
- Matt Slick is now gone. See your wikikids talkpage for more. ForestH2 18:48, 9 January 2007 (EST)
- What does wikikids have to do with this? If you have something to tell me here, then say it here please. Qwerty 18:49, 9 January 2007 (EST)
- I just said look at your wikikids talkpage, I replied there. ForestH2 19:11, 9 January 2007 (EST)
- What does wikikids have to do with this? If you have something to tell me here, then say it here please. Qwerty 18:49, 9 January 2007 (EST)
- Matt Slick is now gone. See your wikikids talkpage for more. ForestH2 18:48, 9 January 2007 (EST)
- Don't take stuff from wikipedia. --Sir James Paul 16:18, 13 January 2007 (EST)
- Dude, you wholesale copied from wikipedia for the Matt Slick article (which Forest has since deleted). Pot calling the kettle black... Qwerty 16:30, 13 January 2007 (EST)
- Yeah, I know but did not at the time. I just wanted to let you know. Have a nice week. --Sir James Paul 16:31, 13 January 2007 (EST)
- but this is your site, is it not? how did you know now your own policy regarding using GDFL-licensed content. and what is the copyright/license for this wiki, anyway? Qwerty 16:32, 13 January 2007 (EST)
- It is a copyvio issue to take content from wikipedia and bring it here. I did not know it is at first but know I do. It is not my policy, it is the law. All stuff here will be released under GDFL. Have a nice week. Sir James Paul 16:36, 13 January 2007 (EST)
- I don't think you understand copyrights or the GDFL. First, if this site's content is released under GDFL, then you should state that somewhere. Second, if this site's content is released under GDFL, then we can take content straight from en.wikipedia, since their content is also under GDFL. You should research that at wikipedia's related pages (I can't seem to paste links here). --Qwerty 16:47, 13 January 2007 (EST)
- Which means it shows Wikireligion is clueless if we can copy info from Wikipedia. ForestH2 10:43, 14 January 2007 (EST)
