Talk:Main Page
From Wikireligion
(→Copyvios) |
(→Copyvios) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 12:13, 3 February 2007 (EST) | [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 12:13, 3 February 2007 (EST) | ||
::Archer7 was talking about the logo and not articles. --[[User:Sir James Paul|Sir James Paul]] 12:14, 3 February 2007 (EST) | ::Archer7 was talking about the logo and not articles. --[[User:Sir James Paul|Sir James Paul]] 12:14, 3 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Here. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <i>The license Wikipedia uses grants free access to our content in the same sense as free software is licensed freely. This principle is known as copyleft. That is to say, Wikipedia content can be copied, modified, and redistributed so long as the new version grants the same freedoms to others and acknowledges the authors of the Wikipedia article used (a direct link back to the article satisfies our author credit requirement). Wikipedia articles therefore will remain free forever and can be used by anybody subject to certain restrictions, most of which serve to ensure that freedom.</i> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Read this paragraph and decide if the info you copyed from Wikipedia applies to this. It most certainly does not. You need to mention a direct link back to the articlie, and you need to acknowledge the authors of the Wikipedia article used. [[User:ForestH2|ForestH2]] 12:20, 3 February 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 3 February 2007
why isn't anyone creating articles here?
- People are. (sigh) ForestH2 11:36, 31 December 2006 (EST)
- It is new. That is why there is a lack of articles here. --Sir James Paul 13:24, 31 December 2006 (EST)
Project inactive
Is it? ForestH2 19:49, 30 January 2007 (EST)
- It seems to be but I do not want it to. Will you promote it for me. --Sir James Paul 07:26, 31 January 2007 (EST)
- I would be glad to promote it. I sort of think this has a better chance of becoming a wikimedia project than Wikikids right now. I'll do some editing now. ForestH2 08:17, 31 January 2007 (EST)
- It seems to be but I do not want it to. Will you promote it for me. --Sir James Paul 07:26, 31 January 2007 (EST)
Copyvios
You know, I think I'll leave. Because:
1. I am not a jerk.
2. When I was in school, I didn't copy the teacher's things in project.
3. The wiki is a complete mess.
ForestH2 12:13, 3 February 2007 (EST)
- Archer7 was talking about the logo and not articles. --Sir James Paul 12:14, 3 February 2007 (EST)
- Here.
The license Wikipedia uses grants free access to our content in the same sense as free software is licensed freely. This principle is known as copyleft. That is to say, Wikipedia content can be copied, modified, and redistributed so long as the new version grants the same freedoms to others and acknowledges the authors of the Wikipedia article used (a direct link back to the article satisfies our author credit requirement). Wikipedia articles therefore will remain free forever and can be used by anybody subject to certain restrictions, most of which serve to ensure that freedom.
Read this paragraph and decide if the info you copyed from Wikipedia applies to this. It most certainly does not. You need to mention a direct link back to the articlie, and you need to acknowledge the authors of the Wikipedia article used. ForestH2 12:20, 3 February 2007 (EST)
