Past CVR BBG Regional Boards

From Wikibbyo

(Difference between revisions)
(→2002-2003 CVR BBG Regional Board)
Line 82: Line 82:
* [[Madricha]] - Michelle Boles (RAM BBG)
* [[Madricha]] - Michelle Boles (RAM BBG)
-
==2002-2003 CVR BBG Regional Board==
+
Let's look at the background: We had three days to reeivw the game and, coincidentally, three days before our issue had to ship. Not the best timing, but for a game this big you suck it up and deal with the distress. Konami's reps mentioned a few times that we'd need to sign a non-disclosure agreement before we left  no big deal, as NDAs are standard when it comes to large releases, and it's not like we're in the habit of spoiling games for people anyway. The author doesn't care about signing an NDA, as it is standard practice, but also because the author isn't big on incorporating spoilers into his reeivws. Parish had ample warning that he was going to sign an NDA. Not only that, there was the pressure to get this game reeivwed and published under so little time, which was about the only dramatic thing that could be culled from a story like this. Again, there is no implication that Parish was being threatened with detention. Why? Because the words  threatened  or  detention  or any variation of such are not even in the article. Not even in the sentence you have quoted again and again. Rob, you must have read something foreboding about the phrase,  made it clear that we wouldn't be leaving until we signed them.  Where do we see any details of threats? You'd think such a breach of rights would warrant an opinion or two from the author. Only Parish doesn't even find the situation all that bad. I've read his comments to the article  he doesn't see it as shady as you do. You're right that Parish's words are not ambiguous; they're as clear as daylight. There is no controversy here. And why not practice some journalism and contact the author for more accurate details instead of making guesses? Or pull some info from other places?
-
* [[N'siah]] - Michelle Boles (RAM BBG)
+
-
* [[S'ganit]] - Ali Ashford (RAM BBG)
+
-
* [[Aym HaChaverot]] - Jess Schary (RAM BBG)
+
-
* [[Mazkirah]] - Jess Fogel (Tikvah BBG)
+
-
* [[Sh'licha]] - Sarah Hausman (Levine BBG)
+
-
* [[Gizborit]] - Steph Bader (RAM BBG)
+
-
* [[Sadranit]] - Alex Guiterman (Genesis BBYO)
+
-
* [[Madricha]] - Deb Greenspan (Ruach BBYO)
+

Revision as of 13:47, 29 September 2012

Contents

BBG Regional Board 10-11

The 7 B'nai B'rith Girls comprising the BBG Regional Board for the 2010-2011 Programming Year

BBG Regional Board 09-10

BBG Regional Board 08-09

BBG Regional Board 2007-2008

The 7 B'nai B'rith Girls comprising the BBG Regional Board for the 2007-2008 Programming Year

2006-2007 CVR BBG Regional Board


2005-2006 CVR BBG Regional Board

2004-2005 CVR BBG Regional Board

2003-2004 CVR BBG Regional Board

Let's look at the background: We had three days to reeivw the game and, coincidentally, three days before our issue had to ship. Not the best timing, but for a game this big you suck it up and deal with the distress. Konami's reps mentioned a few times that we'd need to sign a non-disclosure agreement before we left no big deal, as NDAs are standard when it comes to large releases, and it's not like we're in the habit of spoiling games for people anyway. The author doesn't care about signing an NDA, as it is standard practice, but also because the author isn't big on incorporating spoilers into his reeivws. Parish had ample warning that he was going to sign an NDA. Not only that, there was the pressure to get this game reeivwed and published under so little time, which was about the only dramatic thing that could be culled from a story like this. Again, there is no implication that Parish was being threatened with detention. Why? Because the words threatened or detention or any variation of such are not even in the article. Not even in the sentence you have quoted again and again. Rob, you must have read something foreboding about the phrase, made it clear that we wouldn't be leaving until we signed them. Where do we see any details of threats? You'd think such a breach of rights would warrant an opinion or two from the author. Only Parish doesn't even find the situation all that bad. I've read his comments to the article he doesn't see it as shady as you do. You're right that Parish's words are not ambiguous; they're as clear as daylight. There is no controversy here. And why not practice some journalism and contact the author for more accurate details instead of making guesses? Or pull some info from other places?

Retrieved from "http://72.14.177.54/wikibbyo/Past_CVR_BBG_Regional_Boards"
Personal tools