Troper's Law

From Tv Tropes

(Difference between revisions)
(.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
:''"As a trope page discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Wikipedia approaches one."''
:''"As a trope page discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Wikipedia approaches one."''
-
A common cry among [[TV Tropes]] traditionalists is "We Are Not Wikipedia!" This invokes a slippery slope fallacy that implies that any change to the wiki will lead to TV Tropes losing its "character" and becoming [[Serious Business]]. Of course, [[Wikipedia]] has a different mission in mind, so such a comparison is moot. Besides, when was the last time you heard a Wikipedian claim "We Are Not TV Tropes"? (Since you asked, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nerd_girl July, 2009]). Lesser used, typically as a response, is "[[Imageboards|We Are Not 4chan]]!", implying a descent into chaotic snarkiness.
+
A common cry among [[TV Tropes]] traditionalists is "We Are Not Wikipedia!" This invokes a slippery slope fallacy that implies that any change to the wiki will lead to TV Tropes losing its "character" and becoming [[Serious Business]]. Of course, [[Wikipedia]] has a different mission in mind, so such a comparison is moot. Besides, when was the last time you heard a Wikipedian claim "We Are Not TV Tropes"? (Since you asked, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nerd_girl July, 2009]). Lesser used, typically as a response, is "[[Imageboards|We Are Not 4chan]]!" (or [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]], though there are voices saying Fast Freddie inspired TV Tropes from it; [[Orwellian Editor|he denies it banningly]]), implying a descent into chaotic snarkiness.
A subset of [[Godwin's Law]], and just like that one, invoking this law means the person in question automatically loses the discussion.
A subset of [[Godwin's Law]], and just like that one, invoking this law means the person in question automatically loses the discussion.

Current revision as of 02:53, 10 May 2012

"As a trope page discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Wikipedia approaches one."

A common cry among TV Tropes traditionalists is "We Are Not Wikipedia!" This invokes a slippery slope fallacy that implies that any change to the wiki will lead to TV Tropes losing its "character" and becoming Serious Business. Of course, Wikipedia has a different mission in mind, so such a comparison is moot. Besides, when was the last time you heard a Wikipedian claim "We Are Not TV Tropes"? (Since you asked, July, 2009). Lesser used, typically as a response, is "We Are Not 4chan!" (or Encyclopedia Dramatica, though there are voices saying Fast Freddie inspired TV Tropes from it; he denies it banningly), implying a descent into chaotic snarkiness.

A subset of Godwin's Law, and just like that one, invoking this law means the person in question automatically loses the discussion.

Personal tools