Editing Troper's Law
From Tv Tropes
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Current revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:''"As a trope page discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Wikipedia approaches one."'' | :''"As a trope page discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Wikipedia approaches one."'' | ||
- | A common cry among [[TV Tropes]] traditionalists is "We Are Not Wikipedia!" This invokes a slippery slope fallacy that implies that any change to the wiki will lead to TV Tropes losing its "character" and becoming [[Serious Business]]. Of course, [[Wikipedia]] has a different mission in mind, so such a comparison is moot. Besides, when was the last time you heard a Wikipedian claim "We Are Not TV Tropes"? (Since you asked, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nerd_girl July, 2009]). Lesser used, typically as a response, is "[[Imageboards|We Are Not 4chan]]!" | + | A common cry among [[TV Tropes]] traditionalists is "We Are Not Wikipedia!" This invokes a slippery slope fallacy that implies that any change to the wiki will lead to TV Tropes losing its "character" and becoming [[Serious Business]]. Of course, [[Wikipedia]] has a different mission in mind, so such a comparison is moot. Besides, when was the last time you heard a Wikipedian claim "We Are Not TV Tropes"? (Since you asked, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nerd_girl July, 2009]). Lesser used, typically as a response, is "[[Imageboards|We Are Not 4chan]]!", implying a descent into chaotic snarkiness. |
A subset of [[Godwin's Law]], and just like that one, invoking this law means the person in question automatically loses the discussion. | A subset of [[Godwin's Law]], and just like that one, invoking this law means the person in question automatically loses the discussion. |