Editing Wise grid

== wise grids - district energy, smart homes, and load shifting ==

The emergence of technologies that put power and big (broadband) bandwidth on a single wire ([[USB]], DC-[[powered Ethernet]] and AC-wired [[BPL]]) as [[IEEE standard]]s in 2008Q1 are radically and permanently changing the way building utilities are designed and provided to the end user.  In the same way industrial and office building control systems became unified under [[SNMP]], home and [[MURB]] control systems are likewise
being unified.  While phone, surveillance, control and media (TV, Internet, radio) networks will likely remain
physically separate, they will be based on exactly the same underlying technologies with different optimization
and security profiles.  They will be connected only at
the points where users present credentials (doors) and at external communication points where multiple streams
of monitoring, control and data are switching onto more
than one network to permit instant failover and avoid a
single point of failure in communicating with external
service providers including municipal service providers
(water, sewer, fire, public health, police and so on).

These buildings will be extremely easy to monitor, heat
and cool, and will be in high demand among real estate
porfolio holders including some who operate 'wise grid' 
franchises and are seeking to augment rent income with
utility income that can be gained at little or no risk.

Despite this demand, and the ease of financing unit or
whole-building acquisition with 'green' mortages (that
reward lower utility bills), real estate specialists on
their own (without a franchised operating framework and
supporting services) are poorly equipped to undertake a
'wise grid' deployment.  Power companies are much better
positioned but are conflicted and lack the expertise and
are often prevented by regulation from offering services
that compete directly with telcos, cablecos, or security
monitoring companies.  Telcos and cablecos have no non-
information product on which to piggyback 'dark fibre'
optic buildouts or directly subsidize services that have
yet to prove their value to the customer - or which may
violate their obligation to provide equal service to all
as a 'common carrier' or challenge their data management
capabilities (especially with respect to user privacy).

A more trusted, more skilled, more local, provider of a unified power and control service (called a 'smart grid'
when applied to a large area), operating as a franchise
with the backing of an insurer and bonded services, can 
also provide privacy-sensitive services like credential
verification and key management which no large corporate
provider can.  By remaining relatively small and serving
only clusters of nearby buildings that can be managed on
a part-time basis by a single resident contractor and if
desired a local backup contractor, a 'wise grid' doesn't
unwisely scale its operations to the point of having any
conflicts of interest or difficulties managing privacy 
or to the point of not caring what its customers think (an inevitable problem of any large or public utility).

Haldane's principle, from biology, states that systems
do not become large because they are overly complex - rather they become overly complex because they are too large to be operated by the systems that work when they
are small.  Wise grids remain small enough to be run by
the people who live within them, with outside help only
required in emergencies.  They are much more resilient
and put much less load on public services in a disaster.

=== power and control 2007 ===

*reducing peaks, shifting loads pays off
 but not enough to motivate big investment
*disconnected devices, e.g. thermostats or
 freezer timers, only on high-watt devices
*dissimilar phone, control, cameras, TV, IP
 networks - using incompatible wire/control
*incompatible proprietary software/protocol
*hard to specify unit or building policy
*no single authentication or identity key
*access and ownership of wires disputable

=== power and control 2012 ===

*dynamic rates that represent underlying cost
*rolling brownouts as reaction to system instability
*market-like demand controls to flatten loads
*great replacements for energy wasting devices
*unified network SNMP / iSCSI / IPv6 / wire
*power and data on same wire (802.3at, 1901)
*separate networks with unified monitoring
*easy to specify policies, deploy and test
*unified but factored credential keys/locks
*media (Internet, radio, TV) provided over IP
*all wires in building are owned by its owner

=== the wise grid ===

*exploits local sensors to detect environment
*'data fusion' to create complete heat profile:
 buildings respond like plants to sun/heat/wind
*gathers SNMP over AC (1901) and DC (802.3at)
*uses wireless sensors (802.15.4) judiciously
*uses credentials to anticipate usage pattern
*connects multiple networks at locks/monitors
*can easily isolate any compromised subsystem
*is deployed at discretion of building owners
 and coordinates disparate service providers
*can accomodate multiple providers of similar
 services and even unify the similar offerings

=== between power and builder ===

*neither powerco nor builder 
**have any expertise in controls or devices
**understand SNMP - monitoring is up to user
**anticipate uses - services are too generic
**want responsibility for network/IP problems
**can compete with telco, cableco or customer
**want to own batteries, NOC gear, generators
*there's a gap between them requiring service
*powerco is in conflict of interest with any
 customer seeking to minimize energy usage
*hundreds of systemic motivations for builder
 to simply build large building cheap and go

=== who else can't do it ===

*telco and cableco can't subsidize with energy
 or control services - aren't trust w/security
*unit-holders don't have expertise for control
 and building supervisors can't do it reliably
*adjacent buildings often acquired by one group
 for speculation, easier promotion or combining
 but it's rare to actually have many for long
*municipalities can't deploy service selectively
 but have to advance lowest common denominator
*nonprofit institutions (public housing, co-ops)
 are good testbeds but have vulnerable residents
 or broken governance processes or staff bunkers

=== district energy, media, control ===

*can serve its district for 72 hours in a crisis
 and possibly longer by neighbourly cooperation
*franchises control, surveillance & monitoring
 framework from insurance or portfolio company
*deploys proven technologies to many buildings
 in one neighbourhood, hosted in best basement
*is typically managed by a resident contractor
*specifies or installs several separate nets
*specifies and installs low energy use devices
*resells/insures compatible equipment/services
*bulk-buys phone & media (TV, radio, Internet)
*performs credential verification for insurance
*saves auditable encrypted records of incidents
*bills for utilities and services thru building
*displays interim bills on web or in-unit meter

== everyone's happy ==

=== the happy resident ===

*will be unaffected by any service outage less than 
 72 hours in duration, as a building goes autonomous
*identifies themselves only minimally to systems
*can easily limit control over unit to other users
*can easily set multiple profiles for their own use 
*uses their own cell phone as a 'universal remote'
*is insured against phone or net connection abuse
*is informed of every use of any wireless protocol
*usually won't notice energy or water conservation
*sees immediate savings from any changes of habits
 (proven to result in savings of up to 30 percent)
*pays one itemized bill for all utility services
 (even water if it's unified under same controls)
*is easily removed from unit even if unconcious in
 an emergency - fire and police overrides provide 
 a civil-rights-safe monitored access to the unit

=== the happy city ===

*can ignore 'wise grids' for up to 72 hours in crises
 as they manage themselves and have that much backup
*saves substantial greenhouse gas, water, sewer usage
*minimizes effort of tracking crimes on wireless nets
*minimizes fire risk, enables access of firefighters
*can quickly adapt control approach to all municipal
 services including water, power and perhaps others
*can accept residents' credentials throughout city
 to simplify access to public space, library, school
*can pay for social housing to be equipped with same
 services with greenhouse gas credit and taking some
 percentage of the utility savings from a contractor
*can deploy similar facilities in its own offices to
 better enable telework and shared offices under user
 control without potentially problematic monitoring
 (lacking the controls built in to protect privacy)

=== the happy powerco ===

*makes more money per watt but sells fewer watts
*reduces need for capital investment in generation
*can cease problematic peak generation (coal, oil)
*can operate nuclear plants at full power most of
 the time, significantly decreasing nuclear waste
*reduces need for networking expertise to what is
 required to provide bulk bandwidth or dark fibre
 to reseller putting IEEE 1901 signals on 110 VAC
 and provides redundant connection (via wireless)
*reduces difficulty of balancing grid in areas of
 sophisticated demand management: can motivate any
 'wise grid' to reduce or increase demand or even
 to release stored or generated energy to the grid
*can focus on large scale projects it knows better

=== the happy builder ===

*builds then either sells or keeps collecting rent
*if held/rented, wise grids absorb operating risks
*if sold, investors in wise grids will want to buy
 buildings already designed and wired for services
*can advertise 'green' buildings with low power use
*can sell condo units for higher than market prices
*can rent units for much higher than market prices
 (either equipped or not) including shorter term
 rentals due to flexible hotel-like keys/credentials
*can actually operate building as a minimal hotel if
 this proves practical, e.g. contractors live within
 while building is finished, beta-testing equipment
*qualifies units or buildings for 'green' mortgages
 based on significantly lower utility usage & bills
*participates in phone & media (TV, Internet, radio)
 revenue without taking operating or support risks


''This page [[CC-by-nc-sa by ECG]] - most rights reserved.''