Category talk:RW secret operations
From Rationalwikiwki
(Difference between revisions)
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Technically speaking, even if there have been "secret operations" carried out by people associated with RW - and I'm not saying neither that there has nor that there hasn't been such operations, mind you - is that sufficient to call them "RW operations"? Isn't that a bit like saying e.g. it was an RW activity when I went down to the bakery for bread this morning? --[[User:AKjeldsen|AKjeldsen]] 16:47, 24 February 2008 (EST) | Technically speaking, even if there have been "secret operations" carried out by people associated with RW - and I'm not saying neither that there has nor that there hasn't been such operations, mind you - is that sufficient to call them "RW operations"? Isn't that a bit like saying e.g. it was an RW activity when I went down to the bakery for bread this morning? --[[User:AKjeldsen|AKjeldsen]] 16:47, 24 February 2008 (EST) | ||
+ | :I'm thinking "secret operations" in the sense that of activities carried out: | ||
+ | *with some sort of subterfuge. | ||
+ | *with the object of harming their "enemies". | ||
+ | It is possible you could buy bread with these two objectives, but unlikely.Signes: false flag. |
Revision as of 22:15, 24 February 2008
Technically speaking, even if there have been "secret operations" carried out by people associated with RW - and I'm not saying neither that there has nor that there hasn't been such operations, mind you - is that sufficient to call them "RW operations"? Isn't that a bit like saying e.g. it was an RW activity when I went down to the bakery for bread this morning? --AKjeldsen 16:47, 24 February 2008 (EST)
- I'm thinking "secret operations" in the sense that of activities carried out:
- with some sort of subterfuge.
- with the object of harming their "enemies".
It is possible you could buy bread with these two objectives, but unlikely.Signes: false flag.