Category talk:RW secret operations
From Rationalwikiwki
(Difference between revisions)
(frmt) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:*with the object of harming their "enemies". | :*with the object of harming their "enemies". | ||
:It is possible you could buy bread with these two objectives, but unlikely.Signed: False Flag. | :It is possible you could buy bread with these two objectives, but unlikely.Signed: False Flag. | ||
+ | ::You question the wrong part. No doubt they were 'secret operations', but the question is whether or not they were 'RW' ones. --[[User:82.44.64.173|82.44.64.173]] |
Current revision as of 02:40, 25 February 2008
Technically speaking, even if there have been "secret operations" carried out by people associated with RW - and I'm not saying neither that there has nor that there hasn't been such operations, mind you - is that sufficient to call them "RW operations"? Isn't that a bit like saying e.g. it was an RW activity when I went down to the bakery for bread this morning? --AKjeldsen 16:47, 24 February 2008 (EST)
- I'm thinking "secret operations" in the sense that of activities carried out:
- with some sort of subterfuge.
- with the object of harming their "enemies".
- It is possible you could buy bread with these two objectives, but unlikely.Signed: False Flag.
- You question the wrong part. No doubt they were 'secret operations', but the question is whether or not they were 'RW' ones. --82.44.64.173