Template talk:RWyear
From Rationalwikiwki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Idea for something better?) |
(→Idea for something better?) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:::I'm not smart enough to work this out I'm afraid. Thanks for updating them for me. Signed: False Flag. | :::I'm not smart enough to work this out I'm afraid. Thanks for updating them for me. Signed: False Flag. | ||
::::I'll try to get one of the smarter RW people to figure it out for us. Jan 1 2008 is year 2000, right? {{User:Human/sig}} 15:57, 26 February 2008 (EST) | ::::I'll try to get one of the smarter RW people to figure it out for us. Jan 1 2008 is year 2000, right? {{User:Human/sig}} 15:57, 26 February 2008 (EST) | ||
+ | I tried to use this: {{ #expr: (2000 + {{ #time: z }} ) }} but as you see, it doesn't work. It's based on template:electdays over at RW. Obviously it needs "something" to be installed. {{User:Human/sig}} 13:53, 27 February 2008 (EST) |
Revision as of 18:53, 27 February 2008
this makes perfect sense. Tmtoulouse 01:48, 27 December 2007 (EST)
- Its one year per day, so tomorrow it will be 2004! And then only 4 more days until the actual (real life) NEW YEAR! Do you think its silly?
Idea for something better?
Instead of 1/1/2007 being 1642, it should be -142, and 5/22/2007 should be 1. --98.17.57.5 16:31, 17 February 2008 (EST)
- Yes, 5/22/2007 should be year 1, with RW 1.0 existing in the shadows of BRW time. ALSO, can't this be automated easily? (make it equal to the difference between "today" in code and 5/22/2007)? humanbe in 15:09, 21 February 2008 (EST)
I tried to use this: {{ #expr: (2000 + {{ #time: z }} ) }} but as you see, it doesn't work. It's based on template:electdays over at RW. Obviously it needs "something" to be installed. humanbe in 13:53, 27 February 2008 (EST)