Barbara Shack

From Rationalwikiwki

(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Barbara Shack''' is one of the stranger members of that already strange group of users that make up [[RationalWiki]].
'''Barbara Shack''' is one of the stranger members of that already strange group of users that make up [[RationalWiki]].
-
Her oddly-worded articles are entirely obsessed with relentless, bitter criticism of the Roman Catholic Church.  She frequently seems to operate in some sort of vacuum: possibly because other editors don't want to validate her work by correcting it, or because they fear being struck down by [[AKjeldsen]] if they encourage her.
+
Her oddly-worded articles are entirely obsessed with relentless, bitter criticism of the Roman Catholic Church.  She frequently seems to operate in some sort of vacuum: possibly because other editors don't want to validate her work by correcting it,<ref>With the possible exception of [[Human]]'s complete refactoring, and forced weight-loss program, of the previously tedious, tendentious "Magdalene laundries" article.</ref> or because they fear being struck down by [[AKjeldsen]] if they encourage her.
At any rate, even the most radical atheists on the site (such as [[Bob M]] or [[SusanG]]) seem in no hurry to hang out with her.  In any event, she shows an [[Icewedge]]-like disdain for comments, so communicating with her would not be easy.
At any rate, even the most radical atheists on the site (such as [[Bob M]] or [[SusanG]]) seem in no hurry to hang out with her.  In any event, she shows an [[Icewedge]]-like disdain for comments, so communicating with her would not be easy.
 +
 +
==References and notes==
 +
<references/>
[[Category:Slightly weird RW members]]
[[Category:Slightly weird RW members]]

Revision as of 20:44, 21 February 2008

Barbara Shack is one of the stranger members of that already strange group of users that make up RationalWiki.

Her oddly-worded articles are entirely obsessed with relentless, bitter criticism of the Roman Catholic Church. She frequently seems to operate in some sort of vacuum: possibly because other editors don't want to validate her work by correcting it,<ref>With the possible exception of Human's complete refactoring, and forced weight-loss program, of the previously tedious, tendentious "Magdalene laundries" article.</ref> or because they fear being struck down by AKjeldsen if they encourage her.

At any rate, even the most radical atheists on the site (such as Bob M or SusanG) seem in no hurry to hang out with her. In any event, she shows an Icewedge-like disdain for comments, so communicating with her would not be easy.

References and notes

<references/>

Personal tools