Help:Citing sources - Revision history

Hans Johnson: formatting and expanding

Hans Johnson — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:46:07 GMT

formatting and expanding

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 28 February 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Given that this is a ~~Wiki~~ about RationalWiki it is obvious that no newspaper or other impartial journal is going to have references to back up assertions.	+	Given that this is a wiki about [[RationalWiki]] it is obvious that no newspaper or other impartial journal is going to have references to back up assertions. Furthermore, when reference is made to various secret societies, they--by definition--will not be sourced. As a consequence, most of the information here will be unsupported speculation, malicious rumor and hearsay.

-	~~Furthermore~~, ~~when reference~~ is ~~made~~ to ~~various secret societies~~, ~~they - by definition - will not be sourced.~~	+	For statements about [[:Category:Users\|RationalWikians]] that the RationalWikian disputes, it is recommended that you provide a link to some evidence, either a diff link or to a static version of a page.
-		+
-	As a ~~consequence, most~~ of ~~the information here will be unsupported speculation, malicious rumor and hearsay~~.	+

FalseFlag — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:04:24 GMT

spell

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 28 February 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Given that this is a Wiki about RationalWiki it is obvious that no newspaper or other impartial journal is going to have references to back up assertions.		Given that this is a Wiki about RationalWiki it is obvious that no newspaper or other impartial journal is going to have references to back up assertions.

-	Furthermore, when reference is made to various secret societies, ~~thye~~ - by definition - will not be sourced.	+	Furthermore, when reference is made to various secret societies, they - by definition - will not be sourced.

	As a consequence, most of the information here will be unsupported speculation, malicious rumor and hearsay.		As a consequence, most of the information here will be unsupported speculation, malicious rumor and hearsay.

FalseFlag — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:04:05 GMT

expansion

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 28 February 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~You should cite your sources~~.	+	Given that this is a Wiki about RationalWiki it is obvious that no newspaper or other impartial journal is going to have references to back up assertions.
		+
		+	Furthermore, when reference is made to various secret societies, thye - by definition - will not be sourced.
		+
		+	As a consequence, most of the information here will be unsupported speculation, malicious rumor and hearsay.

Elassint — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:56:45 GMT

a start

New page

You should cite your sources.