Anarchy - Revision history

24.192.155.246: Templatized

24.192.155.246 — Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:26:42 GMT

Templatized

←Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 14 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy THE POWER OF WIKI COMPELLS YOU!]		[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy THE POWER OF WIKI COMPELLS YOU!]
		+	{{fail}}
		+	{{stub}}

Kazer — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 10:46:45 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:46, 6 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~A system of government that people who wouldn't benefit from it fully support. Especially on such a large scale such as the United States or Canada. If anarchy were to break out there, any~~ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/~~China government~~] ~~could easily swoop down and take it over.~~	+	[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy THE POWER OF WIKI COMPELLS YOU!]
-		+
-	~~And nobody gives a rats ass if they work in [[NationStates]]. Nobody.~~	+
-		+
-		+
-	~~{{stub}}~~	+

Hinoa — Sun, 05 Nov 2006 05:34:34 GMT

rv blanking by Kazer

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 5 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~disgrace~~}}	+	A system of government that people who wouldn't benefit from it fully support. Especially on such a large scale such as the United States or Canada. If anarchy were to break out there, any [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China government] could easily swoop down and take it over.
		+
		+	And nobody gives a rats ass if they work in [[NationStates]]. Nobody.
		+
		+
		+	{{stub}}

24.124.89.252 — Sun, 05 Nov 2006 05:08:16 GMT

Kazer — Sun, 05 Nov 2006 00:54:42 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 5 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	A system of government that people who wouldn't benefit from it fully support. Especially on such a large scale such as the United States or Canada. If anarchy were to break out there, any [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China government] could easily swoop down and take it over.
-
-	~~And nobody gives a rats ass if they work in [[NationStates]]. Nobody.~~
-

	{{stub}}		{{stub}}

Hinoa — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:13:26 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 25 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A system of government that people who wouldn't benefit from it fully support. Especially on such a large scale such as the United States or Canada. If anarchy were to break out there, any [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China government] could easily swoop down and take it over.		A system of government that people who wouldn't benefit from it fully support. Especially on such a large scale such as the United States or Canada. If anarchy were to break out there, any [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China government] could easily swoop down and take it over.

-	And nobody gives a rats ass if they work in ~~nation-states~~. Nobody.	+	And nobody gives a rats ass if they work in [[NationStates]]. Nobody.


-	{{stub~~}}{{Template:Fail~~}}	+	{{stub}}

Scottmale24 — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:58:13 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 25 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	A system of government that people who wouldn't benefit from it fully support.	+	A system of government that people who wouldn't benefit from it fully support. Especially on such a large scale such as the United States or Canada. If anarchy were to break out there, any [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China government] could easily swoop down and take it over.
		+
		+	And nobody gives a rats ass if they work in nation-states. Nobody.

-	~~Oddly enough, the 50 most efficient nations in Nationstates are all in a state of anarchy. Huh.~~

	{{stub}}{{Template:Fail}}		{{stub}}{{Template:Fail}}

Janus — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 01:15:42 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 24 October 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Oddly enough, the 50 most efficient nations in Nationstates are all in a state of anarchy. Huh.		Oddly enough, the 50 most efficient nations in Nationstates are all in a state of anarchy. Huh.
		+
		+	{{stub}}{{Template:Fail}}

Sociopathic amphibian — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 01:10:50 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 01:10, 24 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A system of government that people who wouldn't benefit from it fully support.		A system of government that people who wouldn't benefit from it fully support.
		+
		+	Oddly enough, the 50 most efficient nations in Nationstates are all in a state of anarchy. Huh.

Agnelcow — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:03:38 GMT

New page

A system of government that people who wouldn't benefit from it fully support.