Kim et al. (2006)
From Psy3242
| (3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Synesthesia Symposium]] | [[Category:Synesthesia Symposium]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Introduction == | ||
| + | |||
In 2006, Chai-Youn Kim, Randolph Blake, and Thomas J. Palmeri ran two experiments on subjects with graphemic synesthesia to determine whether or not the synesthetically induced color that these individuals experience behaves just like real colors. | In 2006, Chai-Youn Kim, Randolph Blake, and Thomas J. Palmeri ran two experiments on subjects with graphemic synesthesia to determine whether or not the synesthetically induced color that these individuals experience behaves just like real colors. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 9: | ||
For instance, graphemic synesthetes readily report the color of a green letter, even when that letter’s synethetically induced color may be red. One might expect that the two colors would blend, yet these synesthetes describe the colors as if overlaying each other. Yet at the same time, we know that the two color forms can interact in what experimenters call the synesthetic stroop test. Basically, the synesthetically induced colors of a character interfere to reduce the efficiency by which a synesthete names the actual colors of letters. | For instance, graphemic synesthetes readily report the color of a green letter, even when that letter’s synethetically induced color may be red. One might expect that the two colors would blend, yet these synesthetes describe the colors as if overlaying each other. Yet at the same time, we know that the two color forms can interact in what experimenters call the synesthetic stroop test. Basically, the synesthetically induced colors of a character interfere to reduce the efficiency by which a synesthete names the actual colors of letters. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Experiment 1 == | ||
In this experiment, researchers pursued the interaction question by utilizing previously documented grouping effects from real colors, and attempting to replicate these effects with synesthetically-induced colors. For this, experimenters used two patients under the “projector” subtype of synesthete, where synthetically induced colors are seen directly on the corresponding characters and not in the “mind’s eye.” | In this experiment, researchers pursued the interaction question by utilizing previously documented grouping effects from real colors, and attempting to replicate these effects with synesthetically-induced colors. For this, experimenters used two patients under the “projector” subtype of synesthete, where synthetically induced colors are seen directly on the corresponding characters and not in the “mind’s eye.” | ||
| Line 10: | Line 17: | ||
Using two projector type synesthetes, WO and LR, experimenters first ran a bistable Apparent Motion (AM) test to study the role of synesthetic color grouping over time. AM is an illusion produced by rapidly switching the presentation of two overlaying frames, each with fixed tokens located at strategic positions. To visualize the effect, one can imagine a flip book that has only two different alternating pictures in it, with each picture displaying four tokens in different locations. If the tokens are located properly, the presentation of the two frames in rapid succession will induce an optical illusion of either clockwise (CW) or counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the tokens. | Using two projector type synesthetes, WO and LR, experimenters first ran a bistable Apparent Motion (AM) test to study the role of synesthetic color grouping over time. AM is an illusion produced by rapidly switching the presentation of two overlaying frames, each with fixed tokens located at strategic positions. To visualize the effect, one can imagine a flip book that has only two different alternating pictures in it, with each picture displaying four tokens in different locations. If the tokens are located properly, the presentation of the two frames in rapid succession will induce an optical illusion of either clockwise (CW) or counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the tokens. | ||
The type of rotation more likely for the observer to see can be manipulated by how far corresponding tokens of frame one and frame two are spaced. An even better instrument for creating the illusion is color. For instance, a green token in frame one will appear to move to the position of a different green token in frame two, even if a corresponding red or achromatic token is closer. Experimenters use this idea to test whether or not synesthetic colors will also affect a synesthete’s perception of apparent motion. Since color has such a powerful ability to influence perceptual grouping over time in bistable AM, it affords experimenters an opportunity to study possible interactions between real and synesthetic colors. | The type of rotation more likely for the observer to see can be manipulated by how far corresponding tokens of frame one and frame two are spaced. An even better instrument for creating the illusion is color. For instance, a green token in frame one will appear to move to the position of a different green token in frame two, even if a corresponding red or achromatic token is closer. Experimenters use this idea to test whether or not synesthetic colors will also affect a synesthete’s perception of apparent motion. Since color has such a powerful ability to influence perceptual grouping over time in bistable AM, it affords experimenters an opportunity to study possible interactions between real and synesthetic colors. | ||
| - | |||
The experimenters compared controls vs. synesthetes in four conditions: control, synesthetic, interaction, and real. | The experimenters compared controls vs. synesthetes in four conditions: control, synesthetic, interaction, and real. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 28: | ||
Real- two pairs of physically colored, non-synthetic color inducing characters were presented in frame 1 and two different pairs of physically colored, non-synthetic color inducing were presented in frame two. | Real- two pairs of physically colored, non-synthetic color inducing characters were presented in frame 1 and two different pairs of physically colored, non-synthetic color inducing were presented in frame two. | ||
| - | + | == ''Results'' == | |
Both LR and WO experienced the illusion of motion in the synthetic trials, whereas the controls experienced none. This indicates that synthetic colors can behave like real colors, at least in regards to AM. Similarly, and even more remarkable, was the fact that LR and WO experienced perceived motion in the interaction trials, where only one frame is colored. This means that the real colors of frame one did in fact interact with the synthetic colors induced from characters on the other frame. | Both LR and WO experienced the illusion of motion in the synthetic trials, whereas the controls experienced none. This indicates that synthetic colors can behave like real colors, at least in regards to AM. Similarly, and even more remarkable, was the fact that LR and WO experienced perceived motion in the interaction trials, where only one frame is colored. This means that the real colors of frame one did in fact interact with the synthetic colors induced from characters on the other frame. | ||
For some reason, WO experienced no perception of bistable AM in the real condition. | For some reason, WO experienced no perception of bistable AM in the real condition. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Experiment 2 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The second experiment focused on how real and synesthetic colors interact through grouping by color during binocular rivalry. Binocular rivalry occurs when two images are presented to corresponding regions of an individual's eyes and the images compete for perceptual dominance rather than merging smoothly together. Knowing that color promotes perceptual grouping over space in binocular rivalry, Kim et al. wanted to investigate possible interactions between real and synesthetic colors in the same conditions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | WO and LR were tested once again on four conditions of binocular rivalry in which the colors of two competing objects in rival images were varied systematically (real and synesthetic). The observer initiated a 60-second trial by pressing a key and triggering a presentation of two rival targets. They were then responsible for tracking the duration or color groupings in each of the three conditions (synesthetic, interaction, real) by holding down a button when they perceived two characters of the same color. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == ''Results'' == | ||
| + | |||
| + | For both synesthetic observers, the tendency to group real and synesthetic colors was comparable to that found for grouping between synesthetic colors or matches between actual colors. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Implications == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The interactions between the real and synesthetic colors in the experiments substantiated the emerging view that synesthetic colors are indeed perceptual in nature. Moreover, the results implicated that synesthetic colors can be as robust perceptually as real colors, showing a sort of co-existence of both types of color perception. Most importantly, Kim et al.'s study implied that real and synesthetic colors can cooperatively interact to specify motion perception and figural grouping. | ||
Current revision as of 04:54, 28 April 2008
Contents |
Introduction
In 2006, Chai-Youn Kim, Randolph Blake, and Thomas J. Palmeri ran two experiments on subjects with graphemic synesthesia to determine whether or not the synesthetically induced color that these individuals experience behaves just like real colors.
Through previous experiments in figure grouping, visual search, and orientation-contingent color aftereffects, researchers have verified the existence of real synesthetic experiences. However, up until this experiment, there had been few if any experiments designed to detect the differences between real color behavior and synesthetic color behavior, and how the two interact.
For instance, graphemic synesthetes readily report the color of a green letter, even when that letter’s synethetically induced color may be red. One might expect that the two colors would blend, yet these synesthetes describe the colors as if overlaying each other. Yet at the same time, we know that the two color forms can interact in what experimenters call the synesthetic stroop test. Basically, the synesthetically induced colors of a character interfere to reduce the efficiency by which a synesthete names the actual colors of letters.
Experiment 1
In this experiment, researchers pursued the interaction question by utilizing previously documented grouping effects from real colors, and attempting to replicate these effects with synesthetically-induced colors. For this, experimenters used two patients under the “projector” subtype of synesthete, where synthetically induced colors are seen directly on the corresponding characters and not in the “mind’s eye.”
Using two projector type synesthetes, WO and LR, experimenters first ran a bistable Apparent Motion (AM) test to study the role of synesthetic color grouping over time. AM is an illusion produced by rapidly switching the presentation of two overlaying frames, each with fixed tokens located at strategic positions. To visualize the effect, one can imagine a flip book that has only two different alternating pictures in it, with each picture displaying four tokens in different locations. If the tokens are located properly, the presentation of the two frames in rapid succession will induce an optical illusion of either clockwise (CW) or counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the tokens. The type of rotation more likely for the observer to see can be manipulated by how far corresponding tokens of frame one and frame two are spaced. An even better instrument for creating the illusion is color. For instance, a green token in frame one will appear to move to the position of a different green token in frame two, even if a corresponding red or achromatic token is closer. Experimenters use this idea to test whether or not synesthetic colors will also affect a synesthete’s perception of apparent motion. Since color has such a powerful ability to influence perceptual grouping over time in bistable AM, it affords experimenters an opportunity to study possible interactions between real and synesthetic colors.
The experimenters compared controls vs. synesthetes in four conditions: control, synesthetic, interaction, and real.
Control- frames 1 and 2 consisted of pairs of achromatic and non-synesthetic inducing characters.
Synesthetic- frames 1 and 2 contained two pairs of achromatic alphabetic characters, and in each frame one pair of characters induced one synesthetic color (red) and the other pair induced a different synesthetic color (blue).
Interaction- two pairs of physically colored and non-synthetic color inducing characters were presented in frame 1 and two different pairs of achromatic, synthetic color inducing characters with matching synesthetic colors were presented in frame 2.
Real- two pairs of physically colored, non-synthetic color inducing characters were presented in frame 1 and two different pairs of physically colored, non-synthetic color inducing were presented in frame two.
Results
Both LR and WO experienced the illusion of motion in the synthetic trials, whereas the controls experienced none. This indicates that synthetic colors can behave like real colors, at least in regards to AM. Similarly, and even more remarkable, was the fact that LR and WO experienced perceived motion in the interaction trials, where only one frame is colored. This means that the real colors of frame one did in fact interact with the synthetic colors induced from characters on the other frame.
For some reason, WO experienced no perception of bistable AM in the real condition.
Experiment 2
The second experiment focused on how real and synesthetic colors interact through grouping by color during binocular rivalry. Binocular rivalry occurs when two images are presented to corresponding regions of an individual's eyes and the images compete for perceptual dominance rather than merging smoothly together. Knowing that color promotes perceptual grouping over space in binocular rivalry, Kim et al. wanted to investigate possible interactions between real and synesthetic colors in the same conditions.
WO and LR were tested once again on four conditions of binocular rivalry in which the colors of two competing objects in rival images were varied systematically (real and synesthetic). The observer initiated a 60-second trial by pressing a key and triggering a presentation of two rival targets. They were then responsible for tracking the duration or color groupings in each of the three conditions (synesthetic, interaction, real) by holding down a button when they perceived two characters of the same color.
Results
For both synesthetic observers, the tendency to group real and synesthetic colors was comparable to that found for grouping between synesthetic colors or matches between actual colors.
Implications
The interactions between the real and synesthetic colors in the experiments substantiated the emerging view that synesthetic colors are indeed perceptual in nature. Moreover, the results implicated that synesthetic colors can be as robust perceptually as real colors, showing a sort of co-existence of both types of color perception. Most importantly, Kim et al.'s study implied that real and synesthetic colors can cooperatively interact to specify motion perception and figural grouping.
