<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://72.14.177.54/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Ecological region - Revision history</title>
		<link>http://72.14.177.54/oklahoma/?title=Ecological_region&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 20:24:33 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>77.220.240.12:&amp;#32;LAklPtndBGLdzkADyNF</title>
			<link>http://72.14.177.54/oklahoma/?title=Ecological_region&amp;diff=1997&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;LAklPtndBGLdzkADyNF&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Yes, I thought of the Chor-police cntoecnion too, but in the text I thought it was more of a play on the word corpulent. About references to Mahabharata being to blatant, well, I guess that's because people are more familiar with a greater number of incidents from the Mahabharata. About Feluda, I still can't believe that too many people apart from Bongs have *read* it. Still haven't come across too many who have. But if it really IS true that a lot of non-Bongs (Bongs simply LOVE to throw around this term) HAVE read Feluda, then I think it's quite an embarrassment because quite a lot of my Bong friends haven't read either the original or the English translations.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:54:51 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>77.220.240.12</dc:creator>			<comments>http://72.14.177.54/oklahoma/Talk:Ecological_region</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>