Game-direction
From Nomicapolis
Nomicopolis is off to a pretty good start right now. It'll be a bit bumpy while we get used to the rules and the wiki format. This page is intended to be the "message board" for draft proposals and ideas for proposals. Feel free to add sections and comment on anything.
Contents |
Players
There's two of us active right now and many on the census that haven't posted in a few months.
If anyone knows of any people who may be interested, this game could easily take on a few more players.
As per rule 304 only two players are needed to do business.
Governor General?
I haven't yet proposed this, I'd just like to get some feedback on it.
Governor General:
- There shall always be a player designated "Governor General". This player's authority is activated when a player has the won the game or the game is unplayable or when there is unanimous consent for their powers to be activated.
- The Governor General is elected by a simple majority. The Governor General may be recalled from their position at any time by a simple majority.
- The Governor General may resign at any time without consequence.
- When the Governor General's powers are activated their role is to make the game playable again. To do so, they have the authority to repeal rules, amend rules and to reset any attributes such as point counts of all players to an equal amount. The Governor General should make the minimum amount of changes possible to make the game workable again and should make all players equal in status.
- Any changes the Governor General makes when their powers are activated is completely up to their discrestion, but may be over ridden by unanimous consent (excluding the Governor General in this vote.)
- Once the Governor General's powers have been activated and they have finished making the game playable and equalizing players, they shall no longer be Governor General and a new election for this title shall be called. This does not preclude this player from becoming Governor General again.
- In theory I'm in favor of player differentiation such as unique roles for players. I had been toying with the idea of proposing the position of Supreme Grammarian whose job is to summarily correct grammar and spelling errors in the rules. I have an English degree and am certified to teach English (though I'm teaching science - go figure) and minor errors occasionally glare out at me. This game is the ultimate rules-lawyer game and these errors could potentially be abused. Another idea would be the Metanomic General. This position would rotate through the players - once its power is used, the position would automatically rotate to the next player on the census. The power is this: The Metanomic General would devise a meta-rule which provides some stylish limit or outline which rule change proposals must follow in order to be considered proper. A meta-rule would last a month, at which time the next MG would implement his meta-rule. Examples might be: Rule proposals must be in verse; Rule proposals may not use the letter "e"; Rule proposals must consist of a single sentence; etc.
- Anyway, the Governer General is a good idea. I think that, if winning simply resets the game, then there should be some in-game benefit for previous game winners - that way there's some built-in incentive to win. Applejuicefool 22:06, 15 April 2006 (PDT)
- I like those suggestions, especially the Supreme Grammarian. My nomic experience is pretty limited but I have seen well-meaning rules exploited by very minor loop holes, so someone who can copy edit would be good in keeping our rules tight. sinblox 19:18, 16 April 2006 (PDT)
- I agree that the idea of a Governer General is a good one, I also think that the Supreme Grammarian would definately be worthwhile. I would prefer that the Metanomic General be contained into a sub-game with some sort of award for active participation. This is only because I am not good at that sort of thing but I am willing to try it out. Simulacrum 22:54, 17 April 2006 (PDT)
The Judge? Who is that
The core rules mentions a judge but I can't find a reference to who he is or how he is elected? Perhaps we need to make a rule for that?
The judge was abolished in an earlier amendment. I assume now that the judge is an additional simple majority vote on an issue. However that being said I do agree that a judge is needed in the future.
Speed up rulemaking
I feel there is a need to make some rules regarding clarifications of rules. Sometimes a rule may be unclear or contradicting. There should be a possibility of having an ammendment of such a rule passed faster than normal rules.
I do not think any speed rules need to be introduced. I think the current system will allow for rules to be added quickly. Also part of the game is to create a tangled web of rules that do contradict so that you can "win" not that I really want to "win".
More players
I think the game would be more interesting with more players. It seems there are only 2-3 active ones right now. Suggestions?
Rules with non-existant references
Rule 212 still refers to turns and needs to be amended. Also it refers to a Judge, which stated earlier has been abolished.
Rule 306 Refers to Rule 105 that was transmuted.
Rule 309 Is the transmuted Rule 105 that is the same as rule 104 and needs to be repealed.
Comment on 313
Please read and discuss my comment on rule 313 at its talk page. Thank you. Applejuicefool 17:22, 14 November 2006 (EST)
