358

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 23:09, 4 January 2007 by Dayd (Talk | contribs)
This is a mutable rule.
This rule is current, please view the discussion page for its vote archives and any discussion.


Proposed by --Tucana25 16:09, 19 December 2006 (EST)

Rule 306 shall be amended to read, in entirety

1. In order for a proposal to be considered "proposed in the proper way" according to the current ruleset it must contain the following elements:

a) The correct number; i.e. the next number in the sequence.
b) Verbiage that creates an actual or potential change to Nomicapolis play.
c) The user name of the proposer. This should follow the proposal number and precede the text of the proposal in the format used in the proposal of this rule.
d) Each numbered rule change proposal must have its own Nomicapolis article page and discussion page with the proposal number as the title of the page.

2. If a player believes that a rule was not proposed in the proper way, and/or was proposed in an improper way, he should create a section in the discussion page for that rule headed "Improper Proposal". Following the header, the player should state his reasons why he believes the proposal is not proper. The active judge shall then make a decision on the "Improper Proposal".

a) A claim of improper proposal must be made before the proposal is declared to have passed or failed.
b) If a claim of improper proposal passes, then the proposed rule is discarded without completion of a proposal vote. The proposer loses points as if his proposal had been voted down. If the claim fails, the vote on the proposal continues as usual.
c) When a claim of improper proposal passes or fails, the claimant and voters in the claim action gain or lose half as many points as they would have had the claim been a rule proposal.
Personal tools