Talk:386
From Nomicapolis
(→For: vote) |
(→For) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | ||
# [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:05, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | # [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:05, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | # [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 18:27, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
Revision as of 22:27, 8 May 2007
Proposed by --Tucana25 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate shall last until around May 7, 2007 00:01 EST
I don't know yet where this could go...war could affect or be a factor of luck, money, resources, population, points, popularity or something else we dream up and create some fluidity of game elements. It could even be fun as well. --Tucana25 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT) Proposer's summary
Debate
I believe the first instance of "Canton" was intended to read "Player". I'm also not really sure a concept like warring with your neighbors is very well suited to such a simplistic Canton map or a residency system where each Player can move from one Canton to another at will; how can their be patriotism without enduring citizenship? Of course, both of those issues could be solved through future rules, so I don't necessarily oppose this. In fact, as a former Diplomacy player I'm thinking of ways to introduce a better map and a combat system as I write this :) Wooble 10:58, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. Wooble 10:04, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
For
Against
Abstain
