Talk:378

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 17:59, 15 April 2007 (view source) Tucana25 (Talk | contribs) (→For) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 17:59, 15 April 2007 (view source) Tucana25 (Talk | contribs) (→For) Next diff →
Line 28:		Line 28:
	# [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		# [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	# [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 19:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		# [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 19:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
-	--[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 13:59, 15 April 2007 (EDT)	+	#--[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 13:59, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

---

Revision as of 17:59, 15 April 2007

Proposed by: Wooble 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST)

Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against 3.3 Abstain

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary

I propose transmuting 101 with the intention of re-vamping the "new game" conditions to allow for new games to begin in a wiki-friendly format in the future. Wooble 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST)

I suggest that debate run through April 5. Wooble 22:07, 31 March 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

Can you expound? --Tucana25 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST)

As discussed in Game-direction, I think that as the rules currently stand, a win based on unplayability would create a crisis situation since only a "round" would end, but it would be impossible to start a new round. There is the option, of course, of starting a completely new game, but this would start off with a set of rules which isn't optimized for online play, requiring a bunch of rule changes just to get the game into a somewhat playable initial state. I think it would be preferable to set up such a playable initial state in the current rules, and fix it so the game can continue indefinitely. 101 stands in the way, and while I think there should be serious debate before it's actually amended to select a new initial ruleset, it's clear that transmuting it first will be a necessary step so I decided to be bold and propose it. Wooble 22:13, 31 March 2007 (EST)

Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. Wooble 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

For

Add FOR vote

1. Wooble 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
2. BobTHJ 19:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
3. --Tucana25 13:59, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

Against

Add AGAINST vote

Abstain

Add Abstention