Talk:339

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Proposer's summary and declarations)
Line 7: Line 7:
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary]
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary]
-
This is to ensure no one tries to do what I just did again.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 14:22, 28 November 2006 (EST)  Debate will end for this proposal at a later date and time. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 14:38, 29 November 2006 (EST)
+
This is to ensure no one tries to do what I just did again.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 14:22, 28 November 2006 (EST)  "Debate will end for this proposal at **date and time**"  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 14:38, 29 November 2006 (EST)
 +
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST)
== Debate ==
== Debate ==
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
Line 19: Line 20:
=== For ===
=== For ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
-
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
+
# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST)
 +
<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />

Revision as of 15:16, 2 December 2006


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary

This is to ensure no one tries to do what I just did again. --Dayd 14:22, 28 November 2006 (EST) "Debate will end for this proposal at **date and time**" --Dayd 14:38, 29 November 2006 (EST)

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --Dayd 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

A worthy proposal. Perhaps "or" would be a better word choice than "and". Applejuicefool 11:15, 29 November 2006 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

  1. --Dayd 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST)


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Personal tools