Talk:338
From Nomicapolis
(→Debate) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| + | One question and one suggestion. When someone is eventually declared winner, points will be reset. Will we then reset the rules to a ground zero set, or is there a point somewhere along the way that we can choose as a "ground zero+1". Or do we leave the rules as is and just keep playing. I am in favor of finding a point a few rules in where the unanamity issue and the 'turn' issue has been resolved. Someone mentioned giving double voting power for the next game. My suggestion would be to allow the winner to propose one rule that can only be voted down by a unanimous vote of the other players. Or something to that effect. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 22:14, 28 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 03:14, 29 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
We've been talking about making this an ongoing game. Here's a proposal to do it. Note that although this defines a term in immutable and older mutable rules, it does not amend those rules.
Debate
Add comments One question and one suggestion. When someone is eventually declared winner, points will be reset. Will we then reset the rules to a ground zero set, or is there a point somewhere along the way that we can choose as a "ground zero+1". Or do we leave the rules as is and just keep playing. I am in favor of finding a point a few rules in where the unanamity issue and the 'turn' issue has been resolved. Someone mentioned giving double voting power for the next game. My suggestion would be to allow the winner to propose one rule that can only be voted down by a unanimous vote of the other players. Or something to that effect. --Tucana25 22:14, 28 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
