Talk:310

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(For)
Line 18: Line 18:
=== For ===
=== For ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
 +
# [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 07:40, 22 April 2006 (PDT)
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
 +
=== Against ===
=== Against ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]

Revision as of 14:40, 22 April 2006

Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

This amendment gives us the ability to allow plurality votes in the case where we have three or more options, such as if we enact a Governor General title and there are more than two contenders.

Debate

Add comments
Looks good to me. Simulacrum 20:19, 18 April 2006 (PDT)


Vote

For

Add FOR vote

  1. Applejuicefool 07:40, 22 April 2006 (PDT)


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Personal tools