Talk:310
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Proposer's summary and declarations) |
Simulacrum (Talk | contribs) (→Debate) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
+ | Looks good to me. [[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 20:19, 18 April 2006 (PDT) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> |
Revision as of 03:19, 19 April 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This amendment gives us the ability to allow plurality votes in the case where we have three or more options, such as if we enact a Governor General title and there are more than two contenders.
Debate
Add comments Looks good to me. Simulacrum 20:19, 18 April 2006 (PDT)
Vote
For
Against