Talk:383

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(vote template)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
+
Proposed by: [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:11, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
-
{| width="80%" align="center" cellpadding="10" style="border: 5px solid red"
+
-
|-
+
-
| <big>'''Instructions:'''</big>
+
-
This template is intended to be substituted with <tt>'''{{subst:<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt> and '''NOT''' just <tt>'''{{<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt>.
 
-
 
-
Please edit this page and replace everything between <tt><nowiki><!--BEGIN&nbsp;INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> and <tt><nowiki><!--END&nbsp;INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> with the following line
 
-
 
-
Proposed by: <nowiki>[[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:11, 26 April 2007 (EDT)</nowiki>
 
-
 
-
Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)
 
-
 
-
<!--
 
-
NOTE: When editing, do not use the leading space or the <nowiki> </nowiki> tags.  It should only look like this:
 
-
 
-
Proposed by: (four tildes)
 
-
 
-
-->
 
-
(Due to limitations of the MediaWiki software, this substition cannot be performed automatically)
 
-
|}
 
-
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
 
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
{{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}
{{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}
 +
Since there are no more Scorekeeper elections, it makes little sense to have a rule that states what happens if the winner of the Judge election also wins the Scorekeeper election.  I was going to propose amending for clarity, but since the current Judge was opposed to this limitation in the first place and at the moment if a Scorekeeper was elected judge and the other players were unhappy with that they could strip him of Scorekeeper status with the same vote totals it would take to amend this rule, I'm just proposing repeal.  Unless Tucana25 has changed his opinion on whether it matters if one person holds both offices, I see no chance of this proposal failing, so I suggest that debate run through 5:00 PM today.  [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:20, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
== Debate ==
== Debate ==

Revision as of 14:20, 26 April 2007

Proposed by: Wooble 10:11, 26 April 2007 (EDT)


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary

Since there are no more Scorekeeper elections, it makes little sense to have a rule that states what happens if the winner of the Judge election also wins the Scorekeeper election. I was going to propose amending for clarity, but since the current Judge was opposed to this limitation in the first place and at the moment if a Scorekeeper was elected judge and the other players were unhappy with that they could strip him of Scorekeeper status with the same vote totals it would take to amend this rule, I'm just proposing repeal. Unless Tucana25 has changed his opinion on whether it matters if one person holds both offices, I see no chance of this proposal failing, so I suggest that debate run through 5:00 PM today. Wooble 10:20, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

Debate

Add comments


Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Retrieved from "http://72.14.177.54/nomicapolis/Talk:383"
Personal tools