Talk:378

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Proposer's summary and declarations)
(Debate: expounding)
Line 17: Line 17:
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
Can you expound? --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST)
Can you expound? --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST)
 +
:As discussed in [[Game Direction]], I think that as the rules currently stand, a win based on unplayability would create a crisis situation since only a "round" would end, but it would be impossible to start a new round.  There is the option, of course, of starting a completely new game, but this would start off with a set of rules which isn't optimized for online play, requiring a bunch of rule changes just to get the game into a somewhat playable initial state. I think it would be preferable to set up such a playable initial state in the current rules, and fix it so the game can continue indefinitely.  [[101]] stands in the way, and while I think there should be serious debate before it's actually amended to select a new initial ruleset, it's clear that transmuting it first will be a necessary  step so I decided to be bold and propose it. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 22:13, 31 March 2007 (EST)
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->

Revision as of 03:13, 1 April 2007

Proposed by: Wooble 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST)

Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary


I propose transmuting 101 with the intention of re-vamping the "new game" conditions to allow for new games to begin in a wiki-friendly format in the future. Wooble 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST)

I suggest that debate run through April 5. Wooble 22:07, 31 March 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

Can you expound? --Tucana25 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST)

As discussed in Game Direction, I think that as the rules currently stand, a win based on unplayability would create a crisis situation since only a "round" would end, but it would be impossible to start a new round. There is the option, of course, of starting a completely new game, but this would start off with a set of rules which isn't optimized for online play, requiring a bunch of rule changes just to get the game into a somewhat playable initial state. I think it would be preferable to set up such a playable initial state in the current rules, and fix it so the game can continue indefinitely. 101 stands in the way, and while I think there should be serious debate before it's actually amended to select a new initial ruleset, it's clear that transmuting it first will be a necessary step so I decided to be bold and propose it. Wooble 22:13, 31 March 2007 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools