Talk:367

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Debate)
Line 10: Line 10:
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}}
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
-
 
+
Not that I really want added responsiblity, but I think the population should be a function of the Scorekeeper.  I make this suggestion because this is more a statistic and sort of out of game.  Where I see the Judge's sole responsiblity being maintaining the rules and any "in game" problems.  And then could we make this an amendment to [[330]]?  Might just rewrite [[330]] and then add this at the bottom or something.  I'd just like to avoid the situation of rule [[303]] and [[313]]that we had a while back.  Where while neither rule by itself is bad together it just creates more to deal with.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 20:28, 9 January 2007 (EST)
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->

Revision as of 01:28, 10 January 2007

Proposed by: Applejuicefool 10:08, 9 January 2007 (EST)

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

This is my long-awaited plan for making the population dynamic - under this rule, the Citizens of Nomicapolis will be born, live, and die in a pseudo-realistic cycle. Once again, this is just framework for whatever purpose these people are going to have. Debate will end on this proposal at 9 p.m. (EST) Friday, January 12, 2007. Applejuicefool 10:12, 9 January 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

Not that I really want added responsiblity, but I think the population should be a function of the Scorekeeper. I make this suggestion because this is more a statistic and sort of out of game. Where I see the Judge's sole responsiblity being maintaining the rules and any "in game" problems. And then could we make this an amendment to 330? Might just rewrite 330 and then add this at the bottom or something. I'd just like to avoid the situation of rule 303 and 313that we had a while back. Where while neither rule by itself is bad together it just creates more to deal with. --Dayd 20:28, 9 January 2007 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools