Talk:358
From Nomicapolis
Finisterre (Talk | contribs) |
(14 days for debate per 326 and 111) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think its either time to vote, or this proposal fails due to apathy. --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 06:49, 28 December 2006 (EST) | Correct me if I'm wrong but I think its either time to vote, or this proposal fails due to apathy. --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 06:49, 28 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Per [[326]], he gets 14 days. The "debate will end" bit is really just a suggestion as far as I can tell, since [[111]] doesn't allow anyone else but a Judge to force voting to start. [[User:Chuck|chuck]] 12:52, 28 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 28 December 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This fixes the dead-end link to a repealed rule as discussed in the Game Direction
Debate for this proposal shall end December 22, 2006 at 00:01 EST --Tucana25 16:15, 19 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
Add comments Well if we're going to be fixing that why not amend the rule to make the Judge the judge of if a proposal is proper like the original rule set intended. The reason I think this was created and correct me if I'm wrong AJF was because there wasn't a way to determine who a Judge was in the beginning. I mean we've only had 1 vote of improper proposal and it was initally brought to the Judge who ruled that he couldn't rule. That and then we don't have to wait 3 days for all the votes to come in to decide if the rule is proper or not. --Dayd 11:46, 20 December 2006 (EST)
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think its either time to vote, or this proposal fails due to apathy. --Finisterre 06:49, 28 December 2006 (EST)
Per 326, he gets 14 days. The "debate will end" bit is really just a suggestion as far as I can tell, since 111 doesn't allow anyone else but a Judge to force voting to start. chuck 12:52, 28 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
Abstain
