Talk:350
From Nomicapolis
Mike Rosoft (Talk | contribs) (Too harsh punishment) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
As defined by [[330]], the number of players and their active/inactive status only affected the population at the time of the passage of [[330]]. By current rules, the number of active or inactive players no longer affects the population. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:15, 6 December 2006 (EST) | As defined by [[330]], the number of players and their active/inactive status only affected the population at the time of the passage of [[330]]. By current rules, the number of active or inactive players no longer affects the population. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:15, 6 December 2006 (EST) | ||
:I had misremembered the contents of [[330]] when proposing this. Since that proposal allows for tweaking of population, does anyone want to see something like that occur? --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 12:13, 6 December 2006 (EST) | :I had misremembered the contents of [[330]] when proposing this. Since that proposal allows for tweaking of population, does anyone want to see something like that occur? --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 12:13, 6 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think this rule is too harsh to players who have abandoned the game; what is the point in demanding that the player must register a new account to continue in the game? Why not simply state: "A player who has been inactive for six consecutive months shall be presumed to have left the game (see rule [[302]]) and shall be listed on the census page as "departed". If a departed player wishes to rejoin, they may do so by removing the "departed" status from their username, but they will start as a brand new player. ..." And then the rest of your proposal (probably minus the last sentence) would follow. It might need some more tweaking, but I'll leave it on others to comment. - [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 16:24, 7 December 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 21:24, 7 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate for this Proposal shall end December 9, 2006 at 00:01 EST.
This will remove players who seem to have permanently left the game. They will no longer influence actual game-play elements (population, quorum, etc.) --Tucana25 23:15, 5 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
Add comments As defined by 330, the number of players and their active/inactive status only affected the population at the time of the passage of 330. By current rules, the number of active or inactive players no longer affects the population. Applejuicefool 10:15, 6 December 2006 (EST)
- I had misremembered the contents of 330 when proposing this. Since that proposal allows for tweaking of population, does anyone want to see something like that occur? --Tucana25 12:13, 6 December 2006 (EST)
I think this rule is too harsh to players who have abandoned the game; what is the point in demanding that the player must register a new account to continue in the game? Why not simply state: "A player who has been inactive for six consecutive months shall be presumed to have left the game (see rule 302) and shall be listed on the census page as "departed". If a departed player wishes to rejoin, they may do so by removing the "departed" status from their username, but they will start as a brand new player. ..." And then the rest of your proposal (probably minus the last sentence) would follow. It might need some more tweaking, but I'll leave it on others to comment. - Mike Rosoft 16:24, 7 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
