Talk:Judge Election1206
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) (→Proposer's summary and declarations) |
(→Nominations) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:Judge_Election?title=Talk:Judge_Election&action=edit§ion=3 Add Nomination] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:Judge_Election?title=Talk:Judge_Election&action=edit§ion=3 Add Nomination] | ||
| - | + | I nominate [[User:Dayd|Dayd]] --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 21:42, 30 November 2006 (EST) | |
==Vote== | ==Vote== | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:Judge_Election?title=Talk:Judge_Election&action=edit§ion=4 Nominee?] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:Judge_Election?title=Talk:Judge_Election&action=edit§ion=4 Nominee?] | ||
Revision as of 02:42, 1 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
To debate and vote for a Judge. --TomFoolery 14:08, 29 November 2006 (EST)
Per 321 a vote must be held on the first, if we are going to do the nomination thing, it has to be done soon. 321 doesn't provide for a multi-day vote like we do for proposals, and until that is addressed we will have to follow the rule as written. Someone will need to nominate someone soon. I nominated The Juice for the special election, so I would ask that somebody else make a nomination for this regular election. --TomFoolery 14:35, 30 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
Nominations
I nominate Dayd --Tucana25 21:42, 30 November 2006 (EST)
