Talk:319
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| - | With the number of rules we are making right now, isn't there 25 rules very soon? Why difference would it make whether they count towards the total on the census?--[[User: | + | With the number of rules we are making right now, isn't there 25 rules very soon? Why difference would it make whether they count towards the total on the census?--[[User:Shivan|Shivan]] 00:38, 17 November 2006 (EST) |
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 05:38, 17 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
After having defined inactivity I hereby set fourth three sanctions against those who are inactive. I'm very open to suggestions on this one.
--Shivan 16:48, 16 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
- Of course, the points thing won't operate until 305 goes away. Applejuicefool 17:03, 16 November 2006 (EST)
- I wouldn't mind seeing people go into the red for inactivity. Also it might be nice to say that Inactive Player do not count toward the total count on the census. Or we could just remove Players from the Census to an inactive list and just circumvent the rules. Your rule and your choice. I'll support it as is though.--Dayd 21:33, 16 November 2006 (EST)
With the number of rules we are making right now, isn't there 25 rules very soon? Why difference would it make whether they count towards the total on the census?--Shivan 00:38, 17 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
