Talk:305

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 21:26, 12 April 2006 (view source) Applejuicefool (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 21:32, 12 April 2006 (view source) Applejuicefool (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	==Discussion/Debate==	+	<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
		+	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
		+	[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer: Add your summary here]
		+	: Hi! The point of this proposal is to limit the acquisition of points until we decide where we're taking this game.  My idea is that points will not be a part of the game until we reach the current maximum number of rules, at which time we can start gaining/losing points. Of course, if we get to a solid ruleset and we decide we're ready to start playing for the win, we can always repeal this rule early. I'm a new player...I tried to host a Nomic game once before and it folded unceremoniously.  I don't want to come in and make a whole bunch of radical rules (to start with, anyway) - I just want the game to be about something other than points at the beginning. What do ya'll think?  [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 14:15, 12 April 2006 (PDT)
-	Hi! The point of this proposal is to limit the acquisition of points until we decide where we're taking this game.  My idea is that points will not be a part of the game until we reach the current maximum number of rules, at which time we can start gaining/losing points. Of course, if we get to a solid ruleset and we decide we're ready to start playing for the win, we can always repeal this rule early.	+	== Debate ==
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
		+	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
-	I'm a new player...I tried to host a Nomic game once before and it folded unceremoniously.  I don't want to come in and make a whole bunch of radical rules (to start with, anyway) - I just want the game to be about something other than points at the beginning.	+	<!--END DEBATE-->
-	What do ya'll think?  [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 14:15, 12 April 2006 (PDT)	+	== Vote ==
		+	=== For ===
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
		+	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
-	==Voting==	+	=== Against ===
-	'''For'''	+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
-	#	+	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
-	'''Against'''	+	__NOEDITSECTION__
-	#	+

---

Revision as of 21:32, 12 April 2006

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer: Add your summary here

Hi! The point of this proposal is to limit the acquisition of points until we decide where we're taking this game. My idea is that points will not be a part of the game until we reach the current maximum number of rules, at which time we can start gaining/losing points. Of course, if we get to a solid ruleset and we decide we're ready to start playing for the win, we can always repeal this rule early. I'm a new player...I tried to host a Nomic game once before and it folded unceremoniously. I don't want to come in and make a whole bunch of radical rules (to start with, anyway) - I just want the game to be about something other than points at the beginning. What do ya'll think? Applejuicefool 14:15, 12 April 2006 (PDT)

Debate

Add comments

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

Against

Add AGAINST vote