Talk:388
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(vote template) |
(transmuted) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | This rule was transmuted by [[391]]. | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | This | + | This proposal has passed. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 23:13, 11 May 2007 (EDT) |
| - | + | Proposed by [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 11:06, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Proposed by | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.--> | <!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.--> | ||
== Proposer's summary and declarations == | == Proposer's summary and declarations == | ||
{{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}} | {{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}} | ||
| + | I'm dropping the language about the initial set as it's irrelevant. I still think we need to define what happens if the game becomes unplayable and it's impossible to start a new "round of play" with the existing ruleset, but first we need to restore the core of this rule as an immutable rule that governs all other rules. It's probably dangerous to have a mutable rule that states that players need to obey the rules; I'll propose transmuting this back as soon as it passes (if someone else doesn't do so before I get to it) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suggest that debate should end at 1PM today. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 11:12, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
| Line 33: | Line 19: | ||
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
| + | Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. | ||
| + | |||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | ||
| + | # [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 15:30, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | # [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 18:32, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
| + | |||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}} | ||
Current revision as of 01:54, 23 May 2007
This rule was transmuted by 391.
This proposal has passed. Wooble 23:13, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Proposed by Wooble 11:06, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
I'm dropping the language about the initial set as it's irrelevant. I still think we need to define what happens if the game becomes unplayable and it's impossible to start a new "round of play" with the existing ruleset, but first we need to restore the core of this rule as an immutable rule that governs all other rules. It's probably dangerous to have a mutable rule that states that players need to obey the rules; I'll propose transmuting this back as soon as it passes (if someone else doesn't do so before I get to it)
I suggest that debate should end at 1PM today. Wooble 11:12, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Debate
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on.
For
Against
Abstain
