Talk:378
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Debate) |
(repeal expl) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | This rule was amended by [[388]] | ||
| + | |||
Proposed by: [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST) | Proposed by: [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Voting has ended. This Proposal passes. [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 13:14, 23 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page) | Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 14: | ||
I propose transmuting 101 with the intention of re-vamping the "new game" conditions to allow for new games to begin in a wiki-friendly format in the future. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST) | I propose transmuting 101 with the intention of re-vamping the "new game" conditions to allow for new games to begin in a wiki-friendly format in the future. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suggest that debate run through April 5. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 22:07, 31 March 2007 (EST) | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
| Line 15: | Line 21: | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
Can you expound? --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST) | Can you expound? --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | :As discussed in [[Game-direction]], I think that as the rules currently stand, a win based on unplayability would create a crisis situation since only a "round" would end, but it would be impossible to start a new round. There is the option, of course, of starting a completely new game, but this would start off with a set of rules which isn't optimized for online play, requiring a bunch of rule changes just to get the game into a somewhat playable initial state. I think it would be preferable to set up such a playable initial state in the current rules, and fix it so the game can continue indefinitely. [[101]] stands in the way, and while I think there should be serious debate before it's actually amended to select a new initial ruleset, it's clear that transmuting it first will be a necessary step so I decided to be bold and propose it. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 22:13, 31 March 2007 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | ||
| + | # [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | # [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 19:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | #--[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 13:59, 15 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
| + | |||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}} | ||
Current revision as of 03:16, 12 May 2007
This rule was amended by 388
Proposed by: Wooble 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST)
Voting has ended. This Proposal passes. BobTHJ 13:14, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
I propose transmuting 101 with the intention of re-vamping the "new game" conditions to allow for new games to begin in a wiki-friendly format in the future. Wooble 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST)
I suggest that debate run through April 5. Wooble 22:07, 31 March 2007 (EST)
Debate
Can you expound? --Tucana25 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST)
- As discussed in Game-direction, I think that as the rules currently stand, a win based on unplayability would create a crisis situation since only a "round" would end, but it would be impossible to start a new round. There is the option, of course, of starting a completely new game, but this would start off with a set of rules which isn't optimized for online play, requiring a bunch of rule changes just to get the game into a somewhat playable initial state. I think it would be preferable to set up such a playable initial state in the current rules, and fix it so the game can continue indefinitely. 101 stands in the way, and while I think there should be serious debate before it's actually amended to select a new initial ruleset, it's clear that transmuting it first will be a necessary step so I decided to be bold and propose it. Wooble 22:13, 31 March 2007 (EST)
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. Wooble 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
For
- Wooble 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
- BobTHJ 19:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
- --Tucana25 13:59, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
Against
Abstain
