Talk:352

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(User talk:TomFoolery/My proposal workspace moved to Talk:341)
 
(10 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
#redirect [[Talk:341]]
+
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
 +
 
 +
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
 +
 
 +
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
 +
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
 +
Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 December 2006 (EST)
 +
 
 +
== Debate ==
 +
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
 +
 
 +
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
 +
I don't think a point award should be awarded for being Judge.  I think lessen the integrity of the Judge's position.  The Judge should be there because they are deemed worthy to hold the position.  I might be more inclined to reward a Judge based on a popular vote after he leaves office, but even then I'm not sure I want the Judge getting points.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 23:09, 8 December 2006 (EST)
 +
<!--END DEBATE-->
 +
 
 +
== Vote ==
 +
 
 +
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 08:47, 16 December 2006 (EST)
 +
I declare this proposal failed... --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 18:54, 19 December 2006 (EST)
 +
 
 +
=== For ===
 +
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
 +
# --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 08:47, 16 December 2006 (EST)
 +
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
 +
 
 +
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
 +
 
 +
=== Against ===
 +
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
 +
# [[User:Chuck|chuck]] 18:11, 16 December 2006 (EST)
 +
# --[[User:Shivan|Shivan]] 08:48, 17 December 2006 (EST)
 +
# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 11:37, 17 December 2006 (EST)
 +
# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 09:03, 18 December 2006 (EST)
 +
#<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
 +
 
 +
__NOEDITSECTION__

Current revision as of 23:54, 19 December 2006


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 December 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

I don't think a point award should be awarded for being Judge. I think lessen the integrity of the Judge's position. The Judge should be there because they are deemed worthy to hold the position. I might be more inclined to reward a Judge based on a popular vote after he leaves office, but even then I'm not sure I want the Judge getting points. --Dayd 23:09, 8 December 2006 (EST)

Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --TomFoolery 08:47, 16 December 2006 (EST) I declare this proposal failed... --Tucana25 18:54, 19 December 2006 (EST)

For

Add FOR vote

  1. --TomFoolery 08:47, 16 December 2006 (EST)


Against

Add AGAINST vote

  1. chuck 18:11, 16 December 2006 (EST)
  2. --Shivan 08:48, 17 December 2006 (EST)
  3. --Dayd 11:37, 17 December 2006 (EST)
  4. --Tucana25 09:03, 18 December 2006 (EST)


Personal tools