Talk:318
From Nomicapolis
(forgot sig) |
(→For) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
So what would happen if someone repealed a rule that was referenced in another rule? Such as the reference to rule [[105]] which was transmuted and later repealed in rule [[306]]. I suppose in that case it could just be deleted, but what if [[104]] is also transmuted and repealed? --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 21:37, 16 November 2006 (EST) | So what would happen if someone repealed a rule that was referenced in another rule? Such as the reference to rule [[105]] which was transmuted and later repealed in rule [[306]]. I suppose in that case it could just be deleted, but what if [[104]] is also transmuted and repealed? --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 21:37, 16 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | True, this only fixes number change problems, it doesn't fix number deletion problems. Anybody have a logical way to do that automatically by rule? I could add it on here...[[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 22:37, 16 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | So if rule A defers to rule B and rule B is amended to Rule C, then Rule A would defer to rule C as a result? --[[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 01:10, 18 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, this kind of situation is the point of this proposed rule. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:15, 18 November 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 20: | ||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | ||
| - | # <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | + | # [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 09:54, 19 November 2006 (EST) |
| + | # | ||
| + | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
Current revision as of 14:54, 19 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This should fix future number change problems.
Debate
So what would happen if someone repealed a rule that was referenced in another rule? Such as the reference to rule 105 which was transmuted and later repealed in rule 306. I suppose in that case it could just be deleted, but what if 104 is also transmuted and repealed? --Dayd 21:37, 16 November 2006 (EST)
True, this only fixes number change problems, it doesn't fix number deletion problems. Anybody have a logical way to do that automatically by rule? I could add it on here...Applejuicefool 22:37, 16 November 2006 (EST)
So if rule A defers to rule B and rule B is amended to Rule C, then Rule A would defer to rule C as a result? --Simulacrum 01:10, 18 November 2006 (EST)
Yes, this kind of situation is the point of this proposed rule. Applejuicefool 10:15, 18 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
- Applejuicefool 09:54, 19 November 2006 (EST)
Against
