Talk:301

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 19:23, 9 April 2006 (view source) Simulacrum (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Current revision as of 23:35, 10 November 2006 (view source) Simulacrum (Talk | contribs)
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->	+	This is the discussion page for a repealed rule. This rule was amended by [[310]].
-	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==	+
-	Per rule [[111]] I shall set the voting period as no shorter than 48 hours and no longer than 120 hours from the time this proposals is submitted. In regards to rule [[203]] I would suggest that a vote be unanimous if there is no oppose votes (i.e. three players, two of those votes AYE and one does not vote at all, then the proposal has unanimous consent.)	+
-	== Debate ==	+	Its vote archive can be found at this location: [[Talk:301/vote-archive-1]]
-	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]	+
-	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->	+
-		+
-	Hi,	+
-		+
-	I propose we amend the rule to say the following:	+
-		+
-	''In a vote the following definitions will apply for consent/failure. A simple majority shall constitute at least 50% of total votes. A 2/3 majority shall constitute at least 66% of total votes. Unanimous consent shall constitute all votes being positive.''	+
-		+
-	Good job on the template,btw. Looks good. Sorry I haven't been super-active, school ends in a couple weeks though!	+
-		+
-	[[User:Sinblox|sinblox]] 18:59, 5 April 2006 (PDT)	+
-		+
-	Just one question regarding your proposed amendment:	+
-	# Would "'''at least''' 50% of total votes" constitute a simple majority? My understanding of simple majority is that it represents over half of the group. I would prefer the use of "'''...greater than...'''" instead of "'''...at least...'''".	+
-		+
-	Also I would like to take the chance to put forth my own amendment to this proposal, that is to change '''2/3 majority''' to '''supermajority'''.	+
-		+
-	Here is how the proposed rule would read, let me know if you like the change:	+
-		+
-	: In a vote, the following definitions will apply for consent/failure: A simple majority shall constitute a number greater than 50% of total votes. A supermajority shall constitute at least 66% of total votes. Unaminous consent shall constitute all votes being positive.	+
-		+
-		+
-	[[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 21:24, 5 April 2006 (PDT)	+
-	::Sounds good. I'll change the main page over and we'll give it a day or two and vote? [[User:Sinblox|sinblox]] 21:48, 5 April 2006 (PDT)	+
-		+
-	<!--END DEBATE-->	+
-		+
-	== Vote ==	+
-	=== For ===	+
-	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]	+
-	# [[User:Sinblox|sinblox]] 20:02, 7 April 2006 (PDT)	+
-	# [[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 08:42, 8 April 2006 (PDT)	+
-	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->	+
-		+
-	=== Against ===	+
-	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]	+
-	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->	+
-		+
-		+
-	:: there's only 3 players, 2 have voted for this proposal. Can we declare it carried? [[User:Sinblox|sinblox]] 11:58, 9 April 2006 (PDT)	+
-	:: Agreed [[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 12:23, 9 April 2006 (PDT)	+
-	__NOEDITSECTION__	+

---

Current revision as of 23:35, 10 November 2006

This is the discussion page for a repealed rule. This rule was amended by 310.

Its vote archive can be found at this location: Talk:301/vote-archive-1