Talk:386
From Nomicapolis
(summary and declaration) |
(passed.) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | This proposal has passed, having gained the 2 required votes. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 08:54, 9 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS--> | <!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS--> | ||
Proposed by --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT) | Proposed by --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}} | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| - | + | I believe the first instance of "Canton" was intended to read "Player". I'm also not really sure a concept like warring with your neighbors is very well suited to such a simplistic Canton map or a residency system where each Player can move from one Canton to another at will; how can their be patriotism without enduring citizenship? Of course, both of those issues could be solved through future rules, so I don't necessarily oppose this. In fact, as a former Diplomacy player I'm thinking of ways to introduce a better map and a combat system as I write this :) [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:58, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | |
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
| + | Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:04, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | ||
| + | # [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:05, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | # [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 18:27, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
| + | |||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}} | ||
Current revision as of 12:54, 9 May 2007
This proposal has passed, having gained the 2 required votes. Wooble 08:54, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
Proposed by --Tucana25 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate shall last until around May 7, 2007 00:01 EST
I don't know yet where this could go...war could affect or be a factor of luck, money, resources, population, points, popularity or something else we dream up and create some fluidity of game elements. It could even be fun as well. --Tucana25 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT) Proposer's summary
Debate
I believe the first instance of "Canton" was intended to read "Player". I'm also not really sure a concept like warring with your neighbors is very well suited to such a simplistic Canton map or a residency system where each Player can move from one Canton to another at will; how can their be patriotism without enduring citizenship? Of course, both of those issues could be solved through future rules, so I don't necessarily oppose this. In fact, as a former Diplomacy player I'm thinking of ways to introduce a better map and a combat system as I write this :) Wooble 10:58, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. Wooble 10:04, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
For
Against
Abstain
