Talk:378

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(For)
(For)
Line 28: Line 28:
# [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
# [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
# [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 19:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
# [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 19:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
-
--[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 13:59, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
+
#--[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 13:59, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Revision as of 17:59, 15 April 2007

Proposed by: Wooble 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST)

Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary


I propose transmuting 101 with the intention of re-vamping the "new game" conditions to allow for new games to begin in a wiki-friendly format in the future. Wooble 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST)

I suggest that debate run through April 5. Wooble 22:07, 31 March 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

Can you expound? --Tucana25 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST)

As discussed in Game-direction, I think that as the rules currently stand, a win based on unplayability would create a crisis situation since only a "round" would end, but it would be impossible to start a new round. There is the option, of course, of starting a completely new game, but this would start off with a set of rules which isn't optimized for online play, requiring a bunch of rule changes just to get the game into a somewhat playable initial state. I think it would be preferable to set up such a playable initial state in the current rules, and fix it so the game can continue indefinitely. 101 stands in the way, and while I think there should be serious debate before it's actually amended to select a new initial ruleset, it's clear that transmuting it first will be a necessary step so I decided to be bold and propose it. Wooble 22:13, 31 March 2007 (EST)

Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. Wooble 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

For

Add FOR vote

  1. Wooble 19:32, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
  2. BobTHJ 19:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
  3. --Tucana25 13:59, 15 April 2007 (EDT)


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools