Talk:378
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Proposer's summary and declarations) |
(→Debate: expounding) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
Can you expound? --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST) | Can you expound? --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | :As discussed in [[Game Direction]], I think that as the rules currently stand, a win based on unplayability would create a crisis situation since only a "round" would end, but it would be impossible to start a new round. There is the option, of course, of starting a completely new game, but this would start off with a set of rules which isn't optimized for online play, requiring a bunch of rule changes just to get the game into a somewhat playable initial state. I think it would be preferable to set up such a playable initial state in the current rules, and fix it so the game can continue indefinitely. [[101]] stands in the way, and while I think there should be serious debate before it's actually amended to select a new initial ruleset, it's clear that transmuting it first will be a necessary step so I decided to be bold and propose it. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 22:13, 31 March 2007 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 03:13, 1 April 2007
Proposed by: Wooble 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST)
Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
I propose transmuting 101 with the intention of re-vamping the "new game" conditions to allow for new games to begin in a wiki-friendly format in the future. Wooble 17:51, 31 March 2007 (EST)
I suggest that debate run through April 5. Wooble 22:07, 31 March 2007 (EST)
Debate
Can you expound? --Tucana25 20:55, 31 March 2007 (EST)
- As discussed in Game Direction, I think that as the rules currently stand, a win based on unplayability would create a crisis situation since only a "round" would end, but it would be impossible to start a new round. There is the option, of course, of starting a completely new game, but this would start off with a set of rules which isn't optimized for online play, requiring a bunch of rule changes just to get the game into a somewhat playable initial state. I think it would be preferable to set up such a playable initial state in the current rules, and fix it so the game can continue indefinitely. 101 stands in the way, and while I think there should be serious debate before it's actually amended to select a new initial ruleset, it's clear that transmuting it first will be a necessary step so I decided to be bold and propose it. Wooble 22:13, 31 March 2007 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
Abstain
