Talk:378

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 19:09, 15 March 2007 (view source) Wooble (Talk | contribs) (vote template) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 19:13, 15 March 2007 (view source) Wooble (Talk | contribs) (proposer's summary) Next diff →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->		<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-	{| width="80%" align="center" cellpadding="10" style="border: 5px solid red"
-	|-
-	| <big>'''Instructions:'''</big>
-
-	This template is intended to be substituted with <tt>'''{{subst:<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt> and '''NOT''' just <tt>'''{{<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt>.
-
-	Please edit this page and replace everything between <tt><nowiki><!--BEGIN&nbsp;INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> and <tt><nowiki><!--END&nbsp;INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> with the following line
-
	Proposed by: <nowiki>[[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 14:09, 15 March 2007 (EST)</nowiki>		Proposed by: <nowiki>[[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 14:09, 15 March 2007 (EST)</nowiki>
-	Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)
-
-	<!--
-	NOTE: When editing, do not use the leading space or the <nowiki> </nowiki> tags.  It should only look like this:
-
-	Proposed by: (four tildes)
-
-	-->
-	(Due to limitations of the MediaWiki software, this substition cannot be performed automatically)
-	|}
	<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->		<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
Line 25:		Line 7:
	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==		== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
	{{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}		{{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}
-		+	Proposed to clean up garbled language in an existing rule (without, in my opinion, altering the intention of the rule; as written it doesn't actually make sense).  I suggest debate run for 24 hours, as I expect this proposal to be relatively uncontroversial. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 14:13, 15 March 2007 (EST)
	== Debate ==		== Debate ==
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}}

---

Revision as of 19:13, 15 March 2007

Proposed by: [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 14:09, 15 March 2007 (EST)

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against 3.3 Abstain

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary

Proposed to clean up garbled language in an existing rule (without, in my opinion, altering the intention of the rule; as written it doesn't actually make sense). I suggest debate run for 24 hours, as I expect this proposal to be relatively uncontroversial. Wooble 14:13, 15 March 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

Against

Add AGAINST vote

Abstain

Add Abstention