Talk:374
From Nomicapolis
| (6 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->  | <!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->  | ||
| - | + | I declare this proposal passed --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 09:08, 23 January 2007 (EST)  | |
| - | + | ||
| - | |   | + | |
| - | + |    Proposed by: [[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:17, 22 January 2007 (EST)  | |
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->  | <!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->  | ||
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->  | <!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->  | ||
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==  | == Proposer's summary and declarations ==  | ||
| - | {{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}  | + | {{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}    | 
| + | Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 29 January 2007 (EST) <br>   | ||
| + | This rule is intended to declare all new players active when they start.  Currently how I read the rules is since they haven't voted or debated in the last 2 weeks regardless if they've been here or not that makes them inactive.  Also just made it a rule that you can make offensive names.  Since there's a rule guiding calling someone out for breaking the rules this will now give guidance if that problem ever arises.  So I might be offended by the name DaydsuxEggs, while everyone else might be fine with it I'll at least be able to seek a claim from the judge.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:25, 22 January 2007 (EST)  | ||
== Debate ==  | == Debate ==  | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}}  | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}}  | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->  | <!--BEGIN DEBATE-->  | ||
| + | I've wanted to do that to differentiate between new players and reactivating yourself.  Lets vote on this ASAP.  I'm for it. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:20, 22 January 2007 (EST)  | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hee hee...daydsuxeggs...--[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:26, 22 January 2007 (EST)  | ||
<!--END DEBATE-->  | <!--END DEBATE-->  | ||
== Vote ==  | == Vote ==  | ||
| + | Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on  | ||
=== For ===  | === For ===  | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}  | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}  | ||
| - | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->  | + | # --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:28, 22 January 2007 (EST)  | 
| + | # --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:38, 22 January 2007 (EST)  | ||
| + | # --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 06:04, 22 January 2007 (EST)  | ||
| + | #<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->  | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />  | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />  | ||
| + | |||
=== Against ===  | === Against ===  | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}  | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}  | ||
Current revision as of 14:08, 23 January 2007
I declare this proposal passed --Dayd 09:08, 23 January 2007 (EST)
Proposed by: Dayd 01:17, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Contents | 
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 29 January 2007 (EST) 
 
This rule is intended to declare all new players active when they start.  Currently how I read the rules is since they haven't voted or debated in the last 2 weeks regardless if they've been here or not that makes them inactive.  Also just made it a rule that you can make offensive names.  Since there's a rule guiding calling someone out for breaking the rules this will now give guidance if that problem ever arises.  So I might be offended by the name DaydsuxEggs, while everyone else might be fine with it I'll at least be able to seek a claim from the judge.  --Dayd 01:25, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Debate
I've wanted to do that to differentiate between new players and reactivating yourself. Lets vote on this ASAP. I'm for it. --Tucana25 01:20, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Hee hee...daydsuxeggs...--Tucana25 01:26, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on
For
- --Dayd 01:28, 22 January 2007 (EST)
 - --Tucana25 01:38, 22 January 2007 (EST)
 - --Finisterre 06:04, 22 January 2007 (EST)
 
Against
Abstain
