Talk:374
From Nomicapolis
(→Debate) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
I've wanted to do that to differentiate between new players and reactivating yourself. Lets vote on this ASAP. I'm for it. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:20, 22 January 2007 (EST) | I've wanted to do that to differentiate between new players and reactivating yourself. Lets vote on this ASAP. I'm for it. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:20, 22 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hee hee...daydsuxeggs...--[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:26, 22 January 2007 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 06:26, 22 January 2007
Proposed by: Dayd 01:17, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 29 January 2007 (EST)
This rule is intended to declare all new players active when they start. Currently how I read the rules is since they haven't voted or debated in the last 2 weeks regardless if they've been here or not that makes them inactive. Also just made it a rule that you can make offensive names. Since there's a rule guiding calling someone out for breaking the rules this will now give guidance if that problem ever arises. So I might be offended by the name DaydsuxEggs, while everyone else might be fine with it I'll at least be able to seek a claim from the judge. --Dayd 01:25, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Debate
I've wanted to do that to differentiate between new players and reactivating yourself. Lets vote on this ASAP. I'm for it. --Tucana25 01:20, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Hee hee...daydsuxeggs...--Tucana25 01:26, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
Abstain
