Talk:360
From Nomicapolis
| (9 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS--> | <!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS--> | ||
| - | + | ||
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS--> | <!--END INSTRUCTIONS--> | ||
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.--> | <!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.--> | ||
== Proposer's summary and declarations == | == Proposer's summary and declarations == | ||
| - | [http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=1 Proposer's summary] | + | [http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=1 Proposer's summary]Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 3 January 2007. |
| + | This proposal is to add depth to the game by introducing popularity. Hope you like it. This is to simulate in my opinion the will of the masses. The masses don't like loners. Therefore Players will lose popularity for going against the group. Also the masses like action and therefore are more receptive to votes for an agenda. Likewise the masses like to support a winner and therefore Players that vote for the most popular choice will also become more popular themselves. Also you're not going to become popular voting for a loser. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:53, 21 December 2006 (EST) | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| + | I don't mind the idea...i would like to see a stipulation that the scorekeeper would be responsible for keeping track of this. Also, I don't know about the wording on this. Can it be simplified? --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 10:53, 21 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I of course like the idea, but I'm not sure I like it for elections just yet. Could this be shortened to only affect yes/no/abstain proposal votes? If we have more players and a glut of candidates, then I could go for amending it for elections. Also, while I don't think the votes for or against this proposal could be counted toward popularity, it'd probably be wise to include one sentence that says so. [[User:Chuck|chuck]] 11:47, 21 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think its a nice idea, and I don't think there'd be a problem with the votes for or against <i> this </i> proposal counting. But I agree that have a scorekeeper keep a check on it would be wise. --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 13:48, 30 December 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
| + | Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 09:47, 4 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I declare this proposal passed. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 16:05, 9 January 2007 (EST) | ||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | ||
| - | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | + | # --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 09:47, 4 January 2007 (EST) |
| + | # --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:41, 4 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | # --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 05:36, 5 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | # [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 12:29, 5 January 2007 (EST)<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
| + | |||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | ||
| - | # | + | # [[User:Chuck|chuck]] 13:20, 5 January 2007 (EST) (I get points for voting this way. Popularity is overrated :p ) |
| - | + | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
| + | |||
=== Abstain === | === Abstain === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--> | ||
Current revision as of 21:05, 9 January 2007
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer's summaryDebate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 3 January 2007.
This proposal is to add depth to the game by introducing popularity. Hope you like it. This is to simulate in my opinion the will of the masses. The masses don't like loners. Therefore Players will lose popularity for going against the group. Also the masses like action and therefore are more receptive to votes for an agenda. Likewise the masses like to support a winner and therefore Players that vote for the most popular choice will also become more popular themselves. Also you're not going to become popular voting for a loser. --Dayd 01:53, 21 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
I don't mind the idea...i would like to see a stipulation that the scorekeeper would be responsible for keeping track of this. Also, I don't know about the wording on this. Can it be simplified? --Tucana25 10:53, 21 December 2006 (EST)
I of course like the idea, but I'm not sure I like it for elections just yet. Could this be shortened to only affect yes/no/abstain proposal votes? If we have more players and a glut of candidates, then I could go for amending it for elections. Also, while I don't think the votes for or against this proposal could be counted toward popularity, it'd probably be wise to include one sentence that says so. chuck 11:47, 21 December 2006 (EST)
I think its a nice idea, and I don't think there'd be a problem with the votes for or against this proposal counting. But I agree that have a scorekeeper keep a check on it would be wise. --Finisterre 13:48, 30 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --Dayd 09:47, 4 January 2007 (EST)
I declare this proposal passed. --Tucana25 16:05, 9 January 2007 (EST)
For
- --Dayd 09:47, 4 January 2007 (EST)
- --Tucana25 23:41, 4 January 2007 (EST)
- --Finisterre 05:36, 5 January 2007 (EST)
- Applejuicefool 12:29, 5 January 2007 (EST)
Against
- chuck 13:20, 5 January 2007 (EST) (I get points for voting this way. Popularity is overrated :p )
Abstain
