Talk:358

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Proposer's summary and declarations)
(Debate)
Line 14: Line 14:
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
-
 
+
Well if we're going to be fixing that why not amend the rule to make the Judge the judge of if a proposal is proper like the original rule set intended.  The reason I think this was created and correct me if I'm wrong AJF was because there wasn't a way to determine who a Judge was in the beginning.  I mean we've only had 1 vote of improper proposal and it was initally brought to the Judge who ruled that he couldn't rule.  That and then we don't have to wait 3 days for all the votes to come in to decide if the rule is proper or not.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 11:46, 20 December 2006 (EST)
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->

Revision as of 16:46, 20 December 2006

Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary

This fixes the dead-end link to a repealed rule as discussed in the Game Direction

Debate for this proposal shall end December 22, 2006 at 00:01 EST --Tucana25 16:15, 19 December 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add comments Well if we're going to be fixing that why not amend the rule to make the Judge the judge of if a proposal is proper like the original rule set intended. The reason I think this was created and correct me if I'm wrong AJF was because there wasn't a way to determine who a Judge was in the beginning. I mean we've only had 1 vote of improper proposal and it was initally brought to the Judge who ruled that he couldn't rule. That and then we don't have to wait 3 days for all the votes to come in to decide if the rule is proper or not. --Dayd 11:46, 20 December 2006 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools