Talk:353
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Against) |
(→Against) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | ||
# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 09:03, 18 December 2006 (EST) | # --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 09:03, 18 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| - | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | + | # --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 09:31, 18 December 2006 (EST) |
| + | #<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
Revision as of 14:31, 18 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
I don't agree with this proposal based on the fact that if 1) the people still want the Judge in the position knowing full and well that the Judge just quit let them re-elect him...if he "idles" out then it's the electorate's fault and 2) again like 1 if the electorate expell a Judge and then decide that they want him back in so be it. --Dayd 23:13, 8 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --TomFoolery 08:48, 16 December 2006 (EST)
For
- --TomFoolery 08:48, 16 December 2006 (EST)
- --Shivan 07:25, 18 December 2006 (EST)
Against
