Talk:353
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) |
(→Debate) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| - | + | I don't agree with this proposal based on the fact that if 1) the people still want the Judge in the position knowing full and well that the Judge just quit let them re-elect him...if he "idles" out then it's the electorate's fault and 2) again like 1 if the electorate expell a Judge and then decide that they want him back in so be it. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 23:13, 8 December 2006 (EST) | |
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 04:13, 9 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
I don't agree with this proposal based on the fact that if 1) the people still want the Judge in the position knowing full and well that the Judge just quit let them re-elect him...if he "idles" out then it's the electorate's fault and 2) again like 1 if the electorate expell a Judge and then decide that they want him back in so be it. --Dayd 23:13, 8 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
