Talk:348

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Debate)
(Proposer's summary and declarations)
Line 6: Line 6:
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary]"Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00pm EST 17 DEC 2006."  This is intended to end proposals that amend the same rule at the same time.  Looking for information if the wording is good.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 21:19, 5 December 2006 (EST)
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary]"Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00pm EST 17 DEC 2006."  This is intended to end proposals that amend the same rule at the same time.  Looking for information if the wording is good.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 21:19, 5 December 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
Another intent is so that player A doesn't: amend 400 as such while player B: repeal 400.  Well what happens if both pass.  What happens if B passes before A?
== Debate ==
== Debate ==

Revision as of 19:02, 6 December 2006


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary"Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00pm EST 17 DEC 2006." This is intended to end proposals that amend the same rule at the same time. Looking for information if the wording is good. --Dayd 21:19, 5 December 2006 (EST)

Another intent is so that player A doesn't: amend 400 as such while player B: repeal 400. Well what happens if both pass. What happens if B passes before A?

Debate

Add comments

I think it is more interesting when this is encouraged instead of forbidden. More like politics... --Tucana25 22:20, 5 December 2006 (EST)

I also added this proposal to the current events on the front page. --Tucana25 23:26, 5 December 2006 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote



Personal tools