Talk:339
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Debate) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS--> | <!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS--> | ||
| - | + | I declare this proposal passed. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 20:55, 5 December 2006 (EST) | |
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS--> | <!--END INSTRUCTIONS--> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
A worthy proposal. Perhaps "or" would be a better word choice than "and". [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:15, 29 November 2006 (EST) | A worthy proposal. Perhaps "or" would be a better word choice than "and". [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:15, 29 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
This is the one I thought was improperly proposed... --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 19:58, 2 December 2006 (EST) | This is the one I thought was improperly proposed... --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 19:58, 2 December 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | ||
# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST) | # --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | # --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 20:50, 3 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | # [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:09, 4 December 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
| + | |||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | ||
Current revision as of 01:55, 6 December 2006
I declare this proposal passed. --Dayd 20:55, 5 December 2006 (EST)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This is to ensure no one tries to do what I just did again. --Dayd 14:22, 28 November 2006 (EST) "Debate will end for this proposal at **date and time**" --Dayd 14:38, 29 November 2006 (EST)
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --Dayd 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
A worthy proposal. Perhaps "or" would be a better word choice than "and". Applejuicefool 11:15, 29 November 2006 (EST)
This is the one I thought was improperly proposed... --Tucana25 19:58, 2 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
- --Dayd 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST)
- --TomFoolery 20:50, 3 December 2006 (EST)
- Applejuicefool 11:09, 4 December 2006 (EST)
Against
- --Tucana25 19:57, 2 December 2006 (EST)
