Talk:339

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-
 
+
I declare this proposal passed.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 20:55, 5 December 2006 (EST)
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
Line 15: Line 15:
A worthy proposal.  Perhaps "or" would be a better word choice than "and". [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:15, 29 November 2006 (EST)
A worthy proposal.  Perhaps "or" would be a better word choice than "and". [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:15, 29 November 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
This is the one I thought was improperly proposed... --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 19:58, 2 December 2006 (EST)
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->
Line 21: Line 23:
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST)
# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST)
 +
# --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 20:50, 3 December 2006 (EST)
 +
# [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:09, 4 December 2006 (EST)
<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
 +
=== Against ===
=== Against ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
-
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
+
# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 19:57, 2 December 2006 (EST)
 +
<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
__NOEDITSECTION__
__NOEDITSECTION__

Current revision as of 01:55, 6 December 2006

I declare this proposal passed. --Dayd 20:55, 5 December 2006 (EST)

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary

This is to ensure no one tries to do what I just did again. --Dayd 14:22, 28 November 2006 (EST) "Debate will end for this proposal at **date and time**" --Dayd 14:38, 29 November 2006 (EST)

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --Dayd 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

A worthy proposal. Perhaps "or" would be a better word choice than "and". Applejuicefool 11:15, 29 November 2006 (EST)

This is the one I thought was improperly proposed... --Tucana25 19:58, 2 December 2006 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

  1. --Dayd 10:16, 2 December 2006 (EST)
  2. --TomFoolery 20:50, 3 December 2006 (EST)
  3. Applejuicefool 11:09, 4 December 2006 (EST)


Against

Add AGAINST vote

  1. --Tucana25 19:57, 2 December 2006 (EST)


Personal tools