Talk:344
From Nomicapolis
(→Proposer's summary and declarations) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
This proposal combines elements from Rules [[314]] and [[319]]. It addresses concerns I have regarding the process of declaring inactive status as well as returning a player to active status. Rule [[111]] seems to suggest that players should avoid combining two or more rule-changes in one amendment, but there are no rules preventing proposals from amending or repealing multiple rules. If anyone can find evidence to the contrary, I would be happy to split this into multiple proposals, but this seemed easier. I have explained my reasoning for proposing these rule changes in other places, but I would be happy to expound upon them if anyone missed them the first time or would prefer I state them here for archiving purposes. Let me know. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 21:17, 1 December 2006 (EST) | This proposal combines elements from Rules [[314]] and [[319]]. It addresses concerns I have regarding the process of declaring inactive status as well as returning a player to active status. Rule [[111]] seems to suggest that players should avoid combining two or more rule-changes in one amendment, but there are no rules preventing proposals from amending or repealing multiple rules. If anyone can find evidence to the contrary, I would be happy to split this into multiple proposals, but this seemed easier. I have explained my reasoning for proposing these rule changes in other places, but I would be happy to expound upon them if anyone missed them the first time or would prefer I state them here for archiving purposes. Let me know. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 21:17, 1 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| - | + | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| + | As there seems to be no debate, I will open this to voting. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
| + | Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST) | ||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | ||
| + | # --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
Revision as of 04:15, 3 December 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate will end for this proposal on Monday December 4, 2006 at 12:01 AM EST.
This proposal combines elements from Rules 314 and 319. It addresses concerns I have regarding the process of declaring inactive status as well as returning a player to active status. Rule 111 seems to suggest that players should avoid combining two or more rule-changes in one amendment, but there are no rules preventing proposals from amending or repealing multiple rules. If anyone can find evidence to the contrary, I would be happy to split this into multiple proposals, but this seemed easier. I have explained my reasoning for proposing these rule changes in other places, but I would be happy to expound upon them if anyone missed them the first time or would prefer I state them here for archiving purposes. Let me know. --Tucana25 21:17, 1 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
Add comments As there seems to be no debate, I will open this to voting. --Tucana25 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --Tucana25 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)
For
- --Tucana25 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)
Against
